Coreteam/Meeting/20 04 2014
| |||
| Workgroup | Coreteam | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | Sun 20 April 2014 | ||
| Time | 2:30pm | ||
| Venue | Brussels Office | ||
| Address |
| ||
| City | |||
| |||
Loading map...
| |||
| Find routes on OpenStreetMap | |||
| Export | iCalendar | ||
| Clone this meeting | |||
Agenda
Important: We can save a lot of time during the meetings by discussing about complicated topics beforehands. The discussion pad is open. You can also add points and links to the agenda.
- Decisions
- We need to clarify the election page. Who? Where? How?
- Debriefing Signatures started. Needs to be promoted.
- What address do we use for international contacts, and who can receive the mails?
- Proposal (Vincent): International@pirateparty.be, all coreteam members+international squad should be members.
- Proposal (Jonas): a lot of bullshit comes through on this address, I would propose not all coreteam members need to receive this.
- (Vincent) I can agree on this but that means we need to formalize the International Squad, in order to give the possibility to every volunteer to understand, join and participate.
- Finance:
- Appointing budget per list
- Investment of which budget in general campaigning material
- Which designs do we order?
- Coordination
- We have an GA protocol to run for the 31st of May. Next GA (in August) will have a crucial importance for the future orientation of PPBE.
- What can we do to reinforce cooperation between crews?
- Press event in Brussels?
- We need to clarify the election page. Who? Where? How?
- Reporting
- JournalDeBord Squad
- Finance Squad
- Webshop progress? (Since Koen is now coordinating PPI)
- Press presence:
- New squad: Débats Télévisés (fr), including Debat_Tv/Controverse_140413
- Press coordination is still a mess in the french speaking part: The first people who answers to an email solliciation takes the interview. Paul and Marouan are in competition on this topic with destructive effect on our cohesion.
- todo
- Signatures dispatching. Everybody bring your signatures for other people!
- Consistency
- A few squads don't follow the article 56 of the statutes with a negative impact on the transparency of their work. As a consequence, it's difficult to participate to their meetings or understand their decisions. We should:
- Spend some time to help them to report their work. (WikiSquad seems to be an interesting choice to do this job)
- Remind everyone why reporting is important in a party promoting transparency in politics. (Coreteam's job)
- Clarify the article 56 via an amendment. (Resquad_project has been created for this purpose)
- Wonder if an electoral campaign is an acceptable reason to bypass this rule. (Everyone's job)
- A few squads don't follow the article 56 of the statutes with a negative impact on the transparency of their work. As a consequence, it's difficult to participate to their meetings or understand their decisions. We should:
