User:ZeFredz/AmendmentsTool: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Analysis of existing tools: add getop) |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* http://www.akomantoso.org/ : "Akoma Ntoso (“linked hearts” in Akan language of West Africa) defines a “machine readable” set of simple technology-neutral electronic representations (in XML format) of parliamentary, legislative and judiciary documents." | * http://www.akomantoso.org/ : "Akoma Ntoso (“linked hearts” in Akan language of West Africa) defines a “machine readable” set of simple technology-neutral electronic representations (in XML format) of parliamentary, legislative and judiciary documents." | ||
===Other tools to look at=== | |||
* iMio.be (ex-communesplone) : http://www.imio.be/ | |||
==Analysis of existing tools== | ==Analysis of existing tools== |
Revision as of 07:58, 28 July 2014
Liste d'outils existants
- MediaWiki (libre & open source GPL) - example : Events/EGA:2014-08/Amendments
- GetOpinionated : http://opinion.pirateparty.be (libre & open source GPL)
- AT4AM : http://www.at4am.org tool developped for EU (libre & open source EUPL)
- Wirite : http://main.wirite.org/ (proprietary, source not available at this time)
- Git
- German Laws on GitHub : https://github.com/bundestag/gesetze
- Pads (etherpad-lite)
Standards et formats de fichier
- http://www.akomantoso.org/ : "Akoma Ntoso (“linked hearts” in Akan language of West Africa) defines a “machine readable” set of simple technology-neutral electronic representations (in XML format) of parliamentary, legislative and judiciary documents."
Other tools to look at
- iMio.be (ex-communesplone) : http://www.imio.be/
Analysis of existing tools
Template :
Tool name
ToolName - Good for
ToolName - Lacks of
MediaWiki
The Wiki has been used for the Amendments for the August 2014 GA
The main issue with the Wiki is that it's a generalistic tool. It can do nearly anything, but it's not specialized in anything. So using it to do something alse than creating a collaborative web site can be tricky or take a lot of time to enforce structural conventions. In addition, it requires a good communication on how the structuration has to be done by the end users.
MediaWiki - Good for
- Collaborative editing
- Versioning and history
- Easy to use if you now how to use the Wiki
- Flexible
MediaWiki - Lacks of
- Clarity when mixing proposals and amendments on a page
- Support for translations
- History on sections of a page (i.e. Amendments and Proposals)
- Easier way to debate/discuss on amendments and proposals
- Parliamentary/Legislative/Judiciary specific structures of documents
- User-friendliness if your are not a fan of the Wiki tool
- Seing amendments/questions/discussions in the page flow can be tricky
- Voting/decision system (OK? done at the GA, but should be possible to do it online for a more generalized usage)
GetOpinionated
Is a great tool for Liquid Democracy, for simpler than Liquid Feedback. But this is not a proposal/amendment managment tool.
GetOp - Good for
- Liquid democracy
- Discussion
- "liking" comments
- Voting on proposals
- Proxy voting
GetOp - Lacks of
As far as I know :
- A way to add argumentation to a proposal
- A way to handle amendments on proposals
- A way to create new proposals from amendments
- Versionning and history on proposals
- Translation system on proposals/amendments/comments
- A way to add references (links, documents...) on proposals
Requirements for an Proposals/Amendments management tool
working on it...