User:ZeFredz/AmendmentsTool: Difference between revisions

From Pirate Party Belgium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 26: Line 26:


The Wiki has been used for the Amendments for the August 2014 GA
The Wiki has been used for the Amendments for the August 2014 GA
The main issue with the Wiki is that it's a generalistic tool. It can do nearly anything, but it's not specialized in anything. So using it to do something alse than creating a collaborative web site can be tricky or take a lot of time to enforce structural conventions. In addition, it requires a good communication on how the structuration has to be done by the end users.


====MediaWiki - Good for====
====MediaWiki - Good for====
Line 35: Line 37:


====MediaWiki - Lacks of====
====MediaWiki - Lacks of====
The main issue with the Wiki is that it's a generalistic tool. It can do nearly anything, but it's not specialized in anything. So using it to do something alse than creating a collaborative web site can be tricky or take a lot of time to enforce structural conventions. In addition, it requires a good communication on how the structuration has to be done by the end users.


* Clarity when mixing proposals and amendments on a page
* Clarity when mixing proposals and amendments on a page
Line 43: Line 43:
* Easier way to debate/discuss on amendments and proposals
* Easier way to debate/discuss on amendments and proposals
* Parliamentary/Legislative/Judiciary specific structures of documents
* Parliamentary/Legislative/Judiciary specific structures of documents
* Decision system
* User-friendliness if your are not a fan of the Wiki tool
* User-friendliness if your are not a fan of the Wiki tool
* Seing amendments/questions/discussions in the page flow can be tricky
* Seing amendments/questions/discussions in the page flow can be tricky
* Voting/decision system (OK? done at the GA, but should be possible to do it online for a more generalized usage)
===GetOpinionated===
Is a great tool for Liquid Democracy, for simpler than Liquid Feedback. But this is not a proposal/amendment managment tool.
====GetOp - Good for====
* Liquid democracy
* Discussion
* "liking" comments
* Voting on proposals
* Proxy voting
====GetOp - Lacks of====
As far as I know :
* A way to add argumentation to a proposal
* A way to handle amendments on proposals
* A way to create new proposals from amendments
* Versionning and history on proposals
* Translation system on proposals/amendments/comments
* A way to add references (links, documents...) on proposals
==Requirements for an Proposals/Amendments management tool==
working on it...

Revision as of 07:55, 28 July 2014

Liste d'outils existants

Standards et formats de fichier

  • http://www.akomantoso.org/ : "Akoma Ntoso (“linked hearts” in Akan language of West Africa) defines a “machine readable” set of simple technology-neutral electronic representations (in XML format) of parliamentary, legislative and judiciary documents."


Analysis of existing tools

Template :

Tool name

ToolName - Good for

ToolName - Lacks of

MediaWiki

The Wiki has been used for the Amendments for the August 2014 GA

The main issue with the Wiki is that it's a generalistic tool. It can do nearly anything, but it's not specialized in anything. So using it to do something alse than creating a collaborative web site can be tricky or take a lot of time to enforce structural conventions. In addition, it requires a good communication on how the structuration has to be done by the end users.

MediaWiki - Good for

  • Collaborative editing
  • Versioning and history
  • Easy to use if you now how to use the Wiki
  • Flexible

MediaWiki - Lacks of

  • Clarity when mixing proposals and amendments on a page
  • Support for translations
  • History on sections of a page (i.e. Amendments and Proposals)
  • Easier way to debate/discuss on amendments and proposals
  • Parliamentary/Legislative/Judiciary specific structures of documents
  • User-friendliness if your are not a fan of the Wiki tool
  • Seing amendments/questions/discussions in the page flow can be tricky
  • Voting/decision system (OK? done at the GA, but should be possible to do it online for a more generalized usage)

GetOpinionated

Is a great tool for Liquid Democracy, for simpler than Liquid Feedback. But this is not a proposal/amendment managment tool.

GetOp - Good for

  • Liquid democracy
  • Discussion
  • "liking" comments
  • Voting on proposals
  • Proxy voting

GetOp - Lacks of

As far as I know :

  • A way to add argumentation to a proposal
  • A way to handle amendments on proposals
  • A way to create new proposals from amendments
  • Versionning and history on proposals
  • Translation system on proposals/amendments/comments
  • A way to add references (links, documents...) on proposals

Requirements for an Proposals/Amendments management tool

working on it...