User:ZeFredz/AmendmentsTool: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Lacks of) |
(→Analysis of existing tools: add getop) |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
The Wiki has been used for the Amendments for the August 2014 GA | The Wiki has been used for the Amendments for the August 2014 GA | ||
The main issue with the Wiki is that it's a generalistic tool. It can do nearly anything, but it's not specialized in anything. So using it to do something alse than creating a collaborative web site can be tricky or take a lot of time to enforce structural conventions. In addition, it requires a good communication on how the structuration has to be done by the end users. | |||
====MediaWiki - Good for==== | ====MediaWiki - Good for==== | ||
Line 35: | Line 37: | ||
====MediaWiki - Lacks of==== | ====MediaWiki - Lacks of==== | ||
* Clarity when mixing proposals and amendments on a page | * Clarity when mixing proposals and amendments on a page | ||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
* Easier way to debate/discuss on amendments and proposals | * Easier way to debate/discuss on amendments and proposals | ||
* Parliamentary/Legislative/Judiciary specific structures of documents | * Parliamentary/Legislative/Judiciary specific structures of documents | ||
* User-friendliness if your are not a fan of the Wiki tool | * User-friendliness if your are not a fan of the Wiki tool | ||
* Seing amendments/questions/discussions in the page flow can be tricky | * Seing amendments/questions/discussions in the page flow can be tricky | ||
* Voting/decision system (OK? done at the GA, but should be possible to do it online for a more generalized usage) | |||
===GetOpinionated=== | |||
Is a great tool for Liquid Democracy, for simpler than Liquid Feedback. But this is not a proposal/amendment managment tool. | |||
====GetOp - Good for==== | |||
* Liquid democracy | |||
* Discussion | |||
* "liking" comments | |||
* Voting on proposals | |||
* Proxy voting | |||
====GetOp - Lacks of==== | |||
As far as I know : | |||
* A way to add argumentation to a proposal | |||
* A way to handle amendments on proposals | |||
* A way to create new proposals from amendments | |||
* Versionning and history on proposals | |||
* Translation system on proposals/amendments/comments | |||
* A way to add references (links, documents...) on proposals | |||
==Requirements for an Proposals/Amendments management tool== | |||
working on it... |
Revision as of 07:55, 28 July 2014
Liste d'outils existants
- MediaWiki (libre & open source GPL) - example : Events/EGA:2014-08/Amendments
- GetOpinionated : http://opinion.pirateparty.be (libre & open source GPL)
- AT4AM : http://www.at4am.org tool developped for EU (libre & open source EUPL)
- Wirite : http://main.wirite.org/ (proprietary, source not available at this time)
- Git
- German Laws on GitHub : https://github.com/bundestag/gesetze
- Pads (etherpad-lite)
Standards et formats de fichier
- http://www.akomantoso.org/ : "Akoma Ntoso (“linked hearts” in Akan language of West Africa) defines a “machine readable” set of simple technology-neutral electronic representations (in XML format) of parliamentary, legislative and judiciary documents."
Analysis of existing tools
Template :
Tool name
ToolName - Good for
ToolName - Lacks of
MediaWiki
The Wiki has been used for the Amendments for the August 2014 GA
The main issue with the Wiki is that it's a generalistic tool. It can do nearly anything, but it's not specialized in anything. So using it to do something alse than creating a collaborative web site can be tricky or take a lot of time to enforce structural conventions. In addition, it requires a good communication on how the structuration has to be done by the end users.
MediaWiki - Good for
- Collaborative editing
- Versioning and history
- Easy to use if you now how to use the Wiki
- Flexible
MediaWiki - Lacks of
- Clarity when mixing proposals and amendments on a page
- Support for translations
- History on sections of a page (i.e. Amendments and Proposals)
- Easier way to debate/discuss on amendments and proposals
- Parliamentary/Legislative/Judiciary specific structures of documents
- User-friendliness if your are not a fan of the Wiki tool
- Seing amendments/questions/discussions in the page flow can be tricky
- Voting/decision system (OK? done at the GA, but should be possible to do it online for a more generalized usage)
GetOpinionated
Is a great tool for Liquid Democracy, for simpler than Liquid Feedback. But this is not a proposal/amendment managment tool.
GetOp - Good for
- Liquid democracy
- Discussion
- "liking" comments
- Voting on proposals
- Proxy voting
GetOp - Lacks of
As far as I know :
- A way to add argumentation to a proposal
- A way to handle amendments on proposals
- A way to create new proposals from amendments
- Versionning and history on proposals
- Translation system on proposals/amendments/comments
- A way to add references (links, documents...) on proposals
Requirements for an Proposals/Amendments management tool
working on it...