User:ZeFredz/AmendmentsTool: Difference between revisions

From Pirate Party Belgium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 21: Line 21:
====ToolName - Good for====
====ToolName - Good for====


====Lacks of====
====ToolName - Lacks of====


===MediaWiki===
===MediaWiki===

Revision as of 07:48, 28 July 2014

Liste d'outils existants

Standards et formats de fichier

  • http://www.akomantoso.org/ : "Akoma Ntoso (“linked hearts” in Akan language of West Africa) defines a “machine readable” set of simple technology-neutral electronic representations (in XML format) of parliamentary, legislative and judiciary documents."


Analysis of existing tools

Template :

Tool name

ToolName - Good for

ToolName - Lacks of

MediaWiki

The Wiki has been used for the Amendments for the August 2014 GA

MediaWiki - Good for

  • Collaborative editing
  • Versioning and history
  • Easy to use if you now how to use the Wiki
  • Flexible

MediaWiki - Lacks of

The main issue with the Wiki is that it's a generalistic tool. It can do nearly anything, but it's not specialized in anything. So using it to do something alse than creating a collaborative web site can be tricky or take a lot of time to enforce structural conventions. In addition, it requires a good communication on how the structuration has to be done by the end users.

  • Clarity when mixing proposals and amendments on a page
  • Support for translations
  • History on sections of a page (i.e. Amendments and Proposals)
  • Easier way to debate/discuss on amendments and proposals
  • Parliamentary/Legislative/Judiciary specific structures of documents
  • Decision system
  • User-friendliness if your are not a fan of the Wiki tool
  • Seing amendments/questions/discussions in the page flow can be tricky