Basic Income/Documentation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(added structure) |
(→Scientific Papers: added "Not that Basic: How Level, Design and Context Matter for the Redistributive Outcomes of Universal Basic Income") |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
; Knack.be : ''We mogen niet toelaten dat ons collectief leed tijdens deze pandemie voor niets is geweest', schrijft Lander Meeusen. 'Dit is de uitgelezen kans om een experiment te organiseren met mensen die sowieso op een uitkering terugvallen.'' | ; Knack.be : ''We mogen niet toelaten dat ons collectief leed tijdens deze pandemie voor niets is geweest', schrijft Lander Meeusen. 'Dit is de uitgelezen kans om een experiment te organiseren met mensen die sowieso op een uitkering terugvallen.'' | ||
==Scientific Papers== | ==Scientific Papers== | ||
*[https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4361921 Not that Basic: How Level, Design and Context Matter for the Redistributive Outcomes of Universal Basic Income], Elise Aerts, Ive Marx, Gerlinde Verbist, 2023. | |||
**''Proponents of a basic income (BI) claim that it could bring significant reductions in financial poverty, on top of many other benefits, including greatly reduced administrative complexity and cost. Using microsimulation analysis in a comparative two-country setting, we show that the potential poverty-reducing impact of BI strongly depends on exactly how and where it is implemented. Implementing a BI requires far more choices than advocates seem to realize. The level at which the BI is set matters, but its exact specification matters even more. Which parts of the existing tax-benefit system are maintained, and which parts are abolished, modified or replaced? The impact of a BI, be it a low or a high one, thus strongly depends on the characteristics of the system that it is (partially) replacing or complementing, as well as the socio-economic context in which it is introduced. Some versions of BI could potentially help to reduce poverty but always at a significant cost and with substantial sections of the population incurring significant losses, which matters for political feasibility. A partial basic income complementing existing provisions appears to make more potential sense than a full basic income replacing them. The simplicity of BI, however, tends to be vastly overstated.'' | |||
== Reports== | == Reports== | ||
==Administrative Documents== | ==Administrative Documents== |
Latest revision as of 19:02, 22 February 2023
Press Articles
Laten we deze crisis als beslissend keerpunt gebruiken om werk te maken van een basisinkomen, November 2020
- Knack.be
- We mogen niet toelaten dat ons collectief leed tijdens deze pandemie voor niets is geweest', schrijft Lander Meeusen. 'Dit is de uitgelezen kans om een experiment te organiseren met mensen die sowieso op een uitkering terugvallen.
Scientific Papers
- Not that Basic: How Level, Design and Context Matter for the Redistributive Outcomes of Universal Basic Income, Elise Aerts, Ive Marx, Gerlinde Verbist, 2023.
- Proponents of a basic income (BI) claim that it could bring significant reductions in financial poverty, on top of many other benefits, including greatly reduced administrative complexity and cost. Using microsimulation analysis in a comparative two-country setting, we show that the potential poverty-reducing impact of BI strongly depends on exactly how and where it is implemented. Implementing a BI requires far more choices than advocates seem to realize. The level at which the BI is set matters, but its exact specification matters even more. Which parts of the existing tax-benefit system are maintained, and which parts are abolished, modified or replaced? The impact of a BI, be it a low or a high one, thus strongly depends on the characteristics of the system that it is (partially) replacing or complementing, as well as the socio-economic context in which it is introduced. Some versions of BI could potentially help to reduce poverty but always at a significant cost and with substantial sections of the population incurring significant losses, which matters for political feasibility. A partial basic income complementing existing provisions appears to make more potential sense than a full basic income replacing them. The simplicity of BI, however, tends to be vastly overstated.
Reports
Administrative Documents
Legislative Texts
Blog Articles
- Une allocation universelle ? Piège ou levier pour l’autonomie des femmes ?, ASBL Vie Féminine, mars 2019 : Ce document est la synthèse d’un travail de questionnement, de recherche, de débats et de rencontres, mené en 2018 par le groupe de travail régional de Vie Féminine Brabant wallon « Autonomie Économique des Femmes ». [...] Le résultat de son travail présenté ici vise à partager ses apprentissages sous forme de repères, mais aussi de questions restées en suspens et de tensions semblant incontournables aux différentes façons de penser une telle allocation.
- Un peu d'infos issues du peuple de la Théorie Relative de la Monnaie et de Duniter :
- Extrait de l'article : Ce billet veut plus particulièrement mettre en évidence l'absurdité de la question du « financement » du Revenu de Base. Il prend la forme d'une suite de diagrammes (qui devraient se suffire à eux-mêmes bien qu'ils soient accompagnés de commentaires)... la suite sur Mise en boîte du Revenu de Base.
Non-Fiction Books
Fiction Books
Videos
Audios
Actors
Other Documentation
- In praise of Idleness, by Bertrand Russell
- Éloge de l'oisiveté de Bertrand Russell, spectacle de Dominique Rongvaux
- Meeting Ghent Report June 2016
- Try to simplify pad: [1]
- Earlier attempt to summarize arguments: UBIDocuments
- Reports from our debates with the MPOC : FR
- Initiative citoyenne européenne - Commencer à mettre en place des revenus de base inconditionnels (RBI) dans toute l’UE | Europees burgerinitiatief - Voor een onvoorwaardelijk basisinkomen in de hele EU