Events/EGA:2014-01/voting-day1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Vincent.L moved page Events/EGA:2014-01/voting/day1 to Events/EGA:2014-01/voting-day1 without leaving a redirect) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Results of EGA2014-01 Voting - day 1= | |||
''' | =='''Program'''== | ||
1: | 1: | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
N: | N: | ||
Accepted no need counting | Accepted no need counting | ||
6: voting separately on each subpoint | |||
6.1: | 6.1: | ||
Y: | Y: | ||
Line 41: | Line 42: | ||
=> means we remove suppleant from lists | => means we remove suppleant from lists | ||
Accepted no need to count | Accepted no need to count | ||
6.2 | 6.2 | ||
Y: | Y: | ||
N: | N: | ||
accepted | accepted | ||
6.3 | 6.3 | ||
Y: | Y: | ||
Line 51: | Line 54: | ||
yet it doesn't mean the seat can go to another party | yet it doesn't mean the seat can go to another party | ||
Accepted | Accepted | ||
6.4 | 6.4 | ||
Y: 17+ 10 | Y: 17+ 10 | ||
N 7 +4 | N 7 +4 | ||
Accepted | Accepted | ||
6.5 | 6.5 | ||
Y: | Y: | ||
Line 68: | Line 72: | ||
Excludes cooperation. | Excludes cooperation. | ||
Rejected | Rejected | ||
8: | 8: | ||
Y:11+3 =14 | Y:11+3 =14 | ||
Line 92: | Line 96: | ||
Remark: this is about how we want to introduce basic income and determine wether it's possible or not | Remark: this is about how we want to introduce basic income and determine wether it's possible or not | ||
Accepted | Accepted | ||
=='''Statutes'''== | |||
Suggestion: Let's try to discuss more and answer to objections instead of voting directly | |||
12A: | 12A: | ||
Y: | Y: | ||
N: | N: | ||
12B: | 12B: | ||
Y: | Y: | ||
N: | N: | ||
12C: | 12C: | ||
Y: | Y: |
Revision as of 12:18, 25 January 2014
Results of EGA2014-01 Voting - day 1
Program
1: Y: 14 + 3 =17 N: 9 +9= 18 postponed Remark: -Think about implication towards who owns this debt (to debate in arglab?) -This is the same as bankrupt ?
2: Y: 16 + 8= 24 N:10 + 4= 14 accepted
3: Y:11+ 10=21 N:12+3 = 15 Remark: "The most important" could be excessive Accepted
4: Y: N: Remark: there is more to do about animal rights than banning hunt Question: is it also about fishing? No, just hunting Rejected (no need to count)
5: Y: N: Accepted no need counting
6: voting separately on each subpoint 6.1: Y: N: => means we remove suppleant from lists Accepted no need to count 6.2 Y: N: accepted 6.3 Y: N Remark: take care of side effects yet it doesn't mean the seat can go to another party Accepted 6.4 Y: 17+ 10 N 7 +4 Accepted 6.5 Y: N Accepted Comment: It means people can still go for an election while being elected in another assembly
7: Y: N: Remark: reality is more complex, small companies also have public money. Excludes cooperation. Rejected
8: Y:11+3 =14 N:8+9 = 17 Remark: very valuable, but should this be in our program? Rejected
9: Y: N: accepted (unanimity) 10: Y: N: Remark: is already a fact Not true: Belgacom for instance provides both Accepted
11: Y: N: Remark: this is about how we want to introduce basic income and determine wether it's possible or not Accepted
Statutes
Suggestion: Let's try to discuss more and answer to objections instead of voting directly
12A: Y: N: 12B: Y: N: 12C: Y: N: Whole block Rejected, because no consensus (no vote)
13: Y: N: Remark: risk that a new specific rule will be made each time someone is to be kicked out? Rejected
14: Y:16+6=22 N:6+5=11 Accepted