1: postponed Y: 14 + 3 =17 N: 9 +9= 18 Remark: -Think about implication towards who owns this debt (to debate in arglab?) -This is the same as bankrupt ?
2: accepted Y: 16 + 8= 24 N:10 + 4= 14
3: Accepted Y:11+ 10=21 N:12+3 = 15 Remark: "The most important" could be excessive
4: Rejected (no need to count) Y: N: Remark: there is more to do about animal rights than banning hunt Question: is it also about fishing? No, just hunting
5: Accepted no need counting Y: N:
6: voting separately on each subpoint 6.1: Accepted no need to count Y: N: => means we remove suppleant from lists 6.2: accepted Y: N: 6.3: Accepted Y: N Remark: take care of side effects yet it doesn't mean the seat can go to another party 6.4: Accepted Y: 17+ 10 N 7 +4 6.5: Accepted Y: N Comment: It means people can still go for an election while being elected in another assembly
7: Rejected Y: N: Remark: reality is more complex, small companies also have public money. Excludes cooperation.
8: Rejected Y:11+3 =14 N:8+9 = 17 Remark: very valuable, but should this be in our program?
9: accepted (unanimity) Y: N:
10: Accepted Y: N: Remark: is already a fact Not true: Belgacom for instance provides both
11: Accepted Y: N: Remark: this is about how we want to introduce basic income and determine wether it's possible or not
Suggestion: Let's try to discuss more and answer to objections instead of voting directly
12: Whole block Rejected, because no consensus (no vote) 12A: Y: N: 12B: Y: N: 12C: Y: N:
13: Rejected Y: N: Remark: risk that a new specific rule will be made each time someone is to be kicked out?
14: Accepted Y:16+6=22 N:6+5=11