Screwdriver: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "== The Hammer == What's wrong with GA's? * Not enough Preparation from members * Not enough Follow-up * Produces inconsistant or too complex statutes * Voting Generates conf...") |
|||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== The Hammer == | == The Hammer == | ||
What's wrong with GA's? | === What's wrong with GA's? === | ||
* Not enough | * Not enough preparation from members | ||
* Not enough | * Not enough follow-up | ||
* Produces inconsistant or too complex statutes | * Produces inconsistant or too complex statutes | ||
* Voting | * Voting generates conflicts | ||
* Too punctual | * Too punctual | ||
* Too heavy to prepare | * Too heavy to prepare | ||
* | * Low participation rate | ||
== The Screwdriver == | == The Screwdriver == | ||
=== Which are the current problems in our organisation? === | |||
* Less content per event | * too much work to be done, not enough work being done | ||
* Better follow-up (GetOp, crew meetings) | ** Working on it :p --[[User:Vincent.L|Vincent L.]] ([[User talk:Vincent.L|talk]]) 15:39, 2 December 2014 (CET) | ||
* Voting frequency reduced by half | * interested people are not integrated quick enough | ||
* Events | ** Mumble permanence implemented | ||
* Possibility to participate on-line or between the | ** Newsletter soon back on track | ||
** Call to volunteers to answer to "contact@pirateparty.be" in the next assembly. | |||
=== What can we do? === | |||
* Organise an event (<- not really a screwdriver, more like a different hammer) | |||
** Determine clear goals and specify credible intermediate objectives | |||
** Focus on the objectives, not on the structure | |||
** Less content per event | |||
** Better follow-up (GetOp, crew meetings) | |||
** Voting frequency reduced by half | |||
** Events related with each others (each event introduces the next one) | |||
** Possibility to participate on-line or between the events | |||
* Organise the "First yearly questionnaire" | |||
** Ask people on their opinion of all topics which have (or have not) entered the discussions in the past year. | |||
** Go around the pirates and see what they're interested in, find their opinions for possible responses, see what they want to know from other pirates | |||
** Make it informative, non-binding by majority. It's a stimulus for discussion. | |||
** Make the results interactive | |||
Latest revision as of 16:39, 2 December 2014
The Hammer
What's wrong with GA's?
- Not enough preparation from members
- Not enough follow-up
- Produces inconsistant or too complex statutes
- Voting generates conflicts
- Too punctual
- Too heavy to prepare
- Low participation rate
The Screwdriver
Which are the current problems in our organisation?
- too much work to be done, not enough work being done
- Working on it :p --Vincent L. (talk) 15:39, 2 December 2014 (CET)
- interested people are not integrated quick enough
- Mumble permanence implemented
- Newsletter soon back on track
- Call to volunteers to answer to "contact@pirateparty.be" in the next assembly.
What can we do?
- Organise an event (<- not really a screwdriver, more like a different hammer)
- Determine clear goals and specify credible intermediate objectives
- Focus on the objectives, not on the structure
- Less content per event
- Better follow-up (GetOp, crew meetings)
- Voting frequency reduced by half
- Events related with each others (each event introduces the next one)
- Possibility to participate on-line or between the events
- Organise the "First yearly questionnaire"
- Ask people on their opinion of all topics which have (or have not) entered the discussions in the past year.
- Go around the pirates and see what they're interested in, find their opinions for possible responses, see what they want to know from other pirates
- Make it informative, non-binding by majority. It's a stimulus for discussion.
- Make the results interactive