Events/EGA:2014-01/voting-day1: Difference between revisions

From Pirate Party Belgium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Vincent.L moved page Events/EGA:2014-01/voting/day1 to Events/EGA:2014-01/voting-day1 without leaving a redirect)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Vote
=='''Program'''==


'''Programme'''
   1: postponed
 
   1:
   Y: 14 + 3 =17
   Y: 14 + 3 =17
   N: 9 +9= 18
   N: 9 +9= 18
  postponed
   Remark:  
   Remark:  
   -Think about implication towards who owns this debt (to debate in arglab?)
   -Think about implication towards who owns this debt (to debate in arglab?)
   -This is the same as bankrupt ?
   -This is the same as bankrupt ?


   2:
   2: accepted
   Y: 16 + 8= 24
   Y: 16 + 8= 24
   N:10 + 4= 14
   N:10 + 4= 14
  accepted


   3:
   3: Accepted
   Y:11+ 10=21
   Y:11+ 10=21
   N:12+3 = 15
   N:12+3 = 15
   Remark: "The most important" could be excessive
   Remark: "The most important" could be excessive
  Accepted


   4:
   4: Rejected (no need to count)
   Y:
   Y:
   N:
   N:
   Remark: there is more to do about animal rights than banning hunt
   Remark: there is more to do about animal rights than banning hunt
   Question: is it also about fishing?  
   Question: is it also about fishing?  
   No, just hunting
   No, just hunting  
  Rejected (no need to count)


   5:
   5: Accepted no need counting
   Y:
   Y:
   N:
   N:
   Accepted no need counting
 
   6: voting separately on each subpoint
    
    
  6: voting separately on each subpoint
   6.1: Accepted no need to count
   6.1:  
   Y:
   Y:
   N:
   N:
   => means we remove suppleant from lists
   => means we remove suppleant from lists
   Accepted no need to count
    
   6.2
   6.2: accepted
   Y:
   Y:
   N:
   N:
   accepted
    
   6.3
   6.3: Accepted
   Y:
   Y:
   N
   N
   Remark: take care of side effects
   Remark: take care of side effects
   yet it doesn't mean the seat can go to another party
   yet it doesn't mean the seat can go to another party
   Accepted
    
 
   6.4: Accepted
   6.4
   Y: 17+ 10
   Y: 17+ 10
   N 7 +4
   N 7 +4
   Accepted
    
   6.5
   6.5: Accepted
   Y:
   Y:
   N
   N
  Accepted
   Comment: It means people can still go for an election while being elected in another assembly
   Comment: It means people can still go for an election while being elected in another assembly


   7:
   7: Rejected
   Y:
   Y:
   N:
   N:
   Remark: reality is more complex, small companies also have public money.  
   Remark: reality is more complex, small companies also have public money.  
   Excludes cooperation.
   Excludes cooperation.
  Rejected 
 
   
   8: Rejected
   8:
   Y:11+3 =14
   Y:11+3 =14
   N:8+9 = 17
   N:8+9 = 17
   Remark: very valuable, but should this be in our program?
   Remark: very valuable, but should this be in our program?
  Rejected


   9:
   9: accepted (unanimity)
   Y:
   Y:
   N:
   N:
  accepted (unanimity)
 
   
   10: Accepted
   10:
   Y:
   Y:
   N:
   N:
   Remark: is already a fact
   Remark: is already a fact
   Not true: Belgacom for instance provides both
   Not true: Belgacom for instance provides both
  Accepted


   11:
   11: Accepted
   Y:
   Y:
   N:
   N:
   Remark: this is about how we want to introduce basic income and determine wether it's possible or not
   Remark: this is about how we want to introduce basic income and determine wether it's possible or not
  Accepted
 
   
=='''Statutes'''==
  Statutes
 
  Suggestion: Let's try to discuss more and answer to objections instead of voting directly
Suggestion: Let's try to discuss more and answer to objections instead of voting directly
 
  12: Whole block Rejected, because no consensus (no vote)
 
   12A:
   12A:
   Y:
   Y:
   N:
   N:
 
   12B:
   12B:
   Y:
   Y:
   N:
   N:
 
   12C:
   12C:
   Y:
   Y:
   N:
   N:
  Whole block Rejected, because no consensus (no vote)


   13:
   13: Rejected
   Y:
   Y:
   N:
   N:
   Remark: risk that a new specific rule will be made each time someone is to be kicked out?
   Remark: risk that a new specific rule will be made each time someone is to be kicked out?
  Rejected


   14:
   14: Accepted
   Y:16+6=22
   Y:16+6=22
   N:6+5=11
   N:6+5=11
  Accepted

Latest revision as of 12:31, 25 January 2014

Program

  1: postponed
  Y: 14 + 3 =17
  N: 9 +9= 18
  Remark: 
  -Think about implication towards who owns this debt (to debate in arglab?)
  -This is the same as bankrupt ?
  2: accepted
  Y: 16 + 8= 24
  N:10 + 4= 14
  3: Accepted
  Y:11+ 10=21
  N:12+3 = 15
  Remark: "The most important" could be excessive
  4: Rejected (no need to count)
  Y:
  N:
  Remark: there is more to do about animal rights than banning hunt
  Question: is it also about fishing? 
  No, just hunting   
  5: Accepted no need counting
  Y:
  N:
  6: voting separately on each subpoint
  
  6.1: Accepted no need to count
  Y:
  N:
  => means we remove suppleant from lists
  
  6.2: accepted
  Y:
  N:
  
  6.3: Accepted
  Y:
  N
  Remark: take care of side effects
  yet it doesn't mean the seat can go to another party
  
  6.4: Accepted
  Y: 17+ 10
  N 7 +4
  
  6.5: Accepted
  Y:
  N
  Comment: It means people can still go for an election while being elected in another assembly
  7: Rejected
  Y:
  N:
  Remark: reality is more complex, small companies also have public money. 
  Excludes cooperation.
  8: Rejected
  Y:11+3 =14
  N:8+9 = 17
  Remark: very valuable, but should this be in our program?
  9: accepted (unanimity)
  Y:
  N:
  10: Accepted
  Y:
  N:
  Remark: is already a fact
  Not true: Belgacom for instance provides both
  11: Accepted
  Y:
  N:
  Remark: this is about how we want to introduce basic income and determine wether it's possible or not

Statutes

Suggestion: Let's try to discuss more and answer to objections instead of voting directly

  12: Whole block Rejected, because no consensus (no vote)
  
  12A:
  Y:
  N:
  
  12B:
  Y:
  N:
  
  12C:
  Y:
  N:
  13: Rejected
  Y:
  N:
  Remark: risk that a new specific rule will be made each time someone is to be kicked out?
  14: Accepted
  Y:16+6=22
  N:6+5=11