Internal Democracy/Guidelines: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (just a little illustration to give some colors to the page :)) |
(→Structure of the meeting: merge roundtables + typo + small formatting) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
=== Intro ''plenary'' === | === Intro ''plenary'' === | ||
:There | :There is a short roundtable where: | ||
: | :# Everyone tells at what '''time''' they want/need to leave. | ||
: | :# Everyone says how they feel/what their '''mood''' is (1-2 words) | ||
: | :# Everyone tells about their '''expectation'''(s) and/or '''wish'''(es) | ||
: | :#* Expectations (what do they want to do/talk about/see happening). We defined expectations as things need to be done/happen or else you wouldn't want to come any more. | ||
: | :#* Everyone tells their wishes. These are things you would like to see done/like to do, but it's not so bad if these don't happen. | ||
:After this subgroups are formed (3/5 people) based on wishes (what people want to do/talk about). | :After this, subgroups are formed (3/5 people) based on wishes (what people want to do/talk about). | ||
=== Body ''in subgroups'' === | === Body ''in subgroups'' === | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
[[File:InternalDemocracyGuidelineFlagsEN.svg|250px|right|Structure of a meeting]] | [[File:InternalDemocracyGuidelineFlagsEN.svg|250px|right|Structure of a meeting]] | ||
Here people have the possibility to introduce further. | :Here people have the possibility to introduce further. | ||
Discussion/work to be done. | :Discussion/work to be done. | ||
Evaluation: this should be done every time someone intends to leave. This consists of: | :Evaluation: this should be done every time someone intends to leave. This consists of a popcorn roundtable where: | ||
# | :# Everyone says how they feel (see [[#Intro plenary|Intro]]) | ||
# Everyone can say what they thought the pro and contra of the process were. Discussion on how the process can be improved can be done here. | :# Everyone can say what they thought the pro and contra of the process were. Discussion on how the process can be improved can be done here. | ||
=== Closing ''plenary'' === | === Closing ''plenary'' === | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
# Each subgroup reports orally his conclusion/decisions to the whole group | # Each subgroup reports orally his conclusion/decisions to the whole group | ||
## Everyone needs to make sure they understand the conclusions, but there is no further discussion here. | ## Everyone needs to make sure they understand the conclusions, but there is no further discussion here. | ||
## When everyone is sure they understand, everyone can say if they agree/disagree. If everyone agrees, this is a decision. If this is not the case, this can be discussed further in a | ## When everyone is sure they understand, everyone can say if they agree/disagree. If everyone agrees, this is a decision. If this is not the case, this can be discussed further in a next meeting. There is no discussion here. | ||
## If there is no unanimity: decide for a next submeeting involving people disagreeing. | ## If there is no unanimity: decide for a next submeeting involving people disagreeing. | ||
# Evaluation (30 minutes before the end time) | # Evaluation (30 minutes before the end time), popcorn roundtable where: | ||
## | ## Everyone says how they feel (1-2 words) | ||
## Pro's and contra's of the plenaries (intro and closing) and discussion about how to do next time | ## Pro's and contra's of the plenaries (intro and closing) and discussion about how to do next time | ||
# What do we decide for next time: venue, date, hour, general goal, proposition of subgroups. | |||
Revision as of 10:55, 25 July 2017
Introduction
The following guidelines are a work-in-progress document produced by the Internal Democracy group. They are experimented at each of the group's meeting.
Structure of the meeting
Intro plenary
- There is a short roundtable where:
- Everyone tells at what time they want/need to leave.
- Everyone says how they feel/what their mood is (1-2 words)
- Everyone tells about their expectation(s) and/or wish(es)
- Expectations (what do they want to do/talk about/see happening). We defined expectations as things need to be done/happen or else you wouldn't want to come any more.
- Everyone tells their wishes. These are things you would like to see done/like to do, but it's not so bad if these don't happen.
- After this, subgroups are formed (3/5 people) based on wishes (what people want to do/talk about).
Body in subgroups
- Here people have the possibility to introduce further.
- Discussion/work to be done.
- Evaluation: this should be done every time someone intends to leave. This consists of a popcorn roundtable where:
- Everyone says how they feel (see Intro)
- Everyone can say what they thought the pro and contra of the process were. Discussion on how the process can be improved can be done here.
Closing plenary
- Each subgroup reports orally his conclusion/decisions to the whole group
- Everyone needs to make sure they understand the conclusions, but there is no further discussion here.
- When everyone is sure they understand, everyone can say if they agree/disagree. If everyone agrees, this is a decision. If this is not the case, this can be discussed further in a next meeting. There is no discussion here.
- If there is no unanimity: decide for a next submeeting involving people disagreeing.
- Evaluation (30 minutes before the end time), popcorn roundtable where:
- Everyone says how they feel (1-2 words)
- Pro's and contra's of the plenaries (intro and closing) and discussion about how to do next time
- What do we decide for next time: venue, date, hour, general goal, proposition of subgroups.