Difference between revisions of "Screwdriver"
m (→The Screwdriver) |
(→Which are the current problems in our organisation?) |
||
(12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== The Hammer == | == The Hammer == | ||
− | What's wrong with GA's? | + | === What's wrong with GA's? === |
− | * Not enough | + | * Not enough preparation from members |
− | * Not enough | + | * Not enough follow-up |
* Produces inconsistant or too complex statutes | * Produces inconsistant or too complex statutes | ||
− | * Voting | + | * Voting generates conflicts |
* Too punctual | * Too punctual | ||
* Too heavy to prepare | * Too heavy to prepare | ||
− | * | + | * Low participation rate |
== The Screwdriver == | == The Screwdriver == | ||
− | + | === Which are the current problems in our organisation? === | |
− | * Less content per event | + | * too much work to be done, not enough work being done |
− | * Better follow-up (GetOp, crew meetings) | + | ** Working on it :p --[[User:Vincent.L|Vincent L.]] ([[User talk:Vincent.L|talk]]) 15:39, 2 December 2014 (CET) |
− | * Voting frequency reduced by half | + | * interested people are not integrated quick enough |
− | * Events | + | ** Mumble permanence implemented |
− | * Possibility to participate on-line or between the events | + | ** Newsletter soon back on track |
+ | ** Call to volunteers to answer to "contact@pirateparty.be" in the next assembly. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === What can we do? === | ||
+ | * Organise an event (<- not really a screwdriver, more like a different hammer) | ||
+ | ** Determine clear goals and specify credible intermediate objectives | ||
+ | ** Focus on the objectives, not on the structure | ||
+ | ** Less content per event | ||
+ | ** Better follow-up (GetOp, crew meetings) | ||
+ | ** Voting frequency reduced by half | ||
+ | ** Events related with each others (each event introduces the next one) | ||
+ | ** Possibility to participate on-line or between the events | ||
+ | * Organise the "First yearly questionnaire" | ||
+ | ** Ask people on their opinion of all topics which have (or have not) entered the discussions in the past year. | ||
+ | ** Go around the pirates and see what they're interested in, find their opinions for possible responses, see what they want to know from other pirates | ||
+ | ** Make it informative, non-binding by majority. It's a stimulus for discussion. | ||
+ | ** Make the results interactive |
Latest revision as of 16:39, 2 December 2014
Contents
The Hammer
What's wrong with GA's?
- Not enough preparation from members
- Not enough follow-up
- Produces inconsistant or too complex statutes
- Voting generates conflicts
- Too punctual
- Too heavy to prepare
- Low participation rate
The Screwdriver
Which are the current problems in our organisation?
- too much work to be done, not enough work being done
- Working on it :p --Vincent L. (talk) 15:39, 2 December 2014 (CET)
- interested people are not integrated quick enough
- Mumble permanence implemented
- Newsletter soon back on track
- Call to volunteers to answer to "contact@pirateparty.be" in the next assembly.
What can we do?
- Organise an event (<- not really a screwdriver, more like a different hammer)
- Determine clear goals and specify credible intermediate objectives
- Focus on the objectives, not on the structure
- Less content per event
- Better follow-up (GetOp, crew meetings)
- Voting frequency reduced by half
- Events related with each others (each event introduces the next one)
- Possibility to participate on-line or between the events
- Organise the "First yearly questionnaire"
- Ask people on their opinion of all topics which have (or have not) entered the discussions in the past year.
- Go around the pirates and see what they're interested in, find their opinions for possible responses, see what they want to know from other pirates
- Make it informative, non-binding by majority. It's a stimulus for discussion.
- Make the results interactive