Events/EGA:2014-01/voting-day1: Difference between revisions

From Pirate Party Belgium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Vincent.L moved page Events/EGA:2014-01/voting/day1 to Events/EGA:2014-01/voting-day1 without leaving a redirect)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Vote
=Results of EGA2014-01 Voting - day 1=


'''Programme'''
=='''Program'''==


   1:
   1:
Line 34: Line 34:
   N:
   N:
   Accepted no need counting
   Accepted no need counting
  6: voting separately on each subpoint
    
    
  6: voting separately on each subpoint
   6.1:  
   6.1:  
   Y:
   Y:
Line 41: Line 42:
   => means we remove suppleant from lists
   => means we remove suppleant from lists
   Accepted no need to count
   Accepted no need to count
 
   6.2
   6.2
   Y:
   Y:
   N:
   N:
   accepted
   accepted
 
   6.3
   6.3
   Y:
   Y:
Line 51: Line 54:
   yet it doesn't mean the seat can go to another party
   yet it doesn't mean the seat can go to another party
   Accepted
   Accepted
 
 
   6.4
   6.4
   Y: 17+ 10
   Y: 17+ 10
   N 7 +4
   N 7 +4
   Accepted
   Accepted
 
   6.5
   6.5
   Y:
   Y:
Line 68: Line 72:
   Excludes cooperation.
   Excludes cooperation.
   Rejected   
   Rejected   
   
 
   8:
   8:
   Y:11+3 =14
   Y:11+3 =14
Line 92: Line 96:
   Remark: this is about how we want to introduce basic income and determine wether it's possible or not
   Remark: this is about how we want to introduce basic income and determine wether it's possible or not
   Accepted
   Accepted
   
 
  Statutes
=='''Statutes'''==
  Suggestion: Let's try to discuss more and answer to objections instead of voting directly
 
Suggestion: Let's try to discuss more and answer to objections instead of voting directly
 
   12A:
   12A:
   Y:
   Y:
   N:
   N:
 
   12B:
   12B:
   Y:
   Y:
   N:
   N:
 
   12C:
   12C:
   Y:
   Y:

Revision as of 12:18, 25 January 2014

Results of EGA2014-01 Voting - day 1

Program

  1:
  Y: 14 + 3 =17
  N: 9 +9= 18
  postponed
  Remark: 
  -Think about implication towards who owns this debt (to debate in arglab?)
  -This is the same as bankrupt ?
  2:
  Y: 16 + 8= 24
  N:10 + 4= 14
  accepted
  3:
  Y:11+ 10=21
  N:12+3 = 15
  Remark: "The most important" could be excessive
  Accepted
  4:
  Y:
  N:
  Remark: there is more to do about animal rights than banning hunt
  Question: is it also about fishing? 
  No, just hunting
  Rejected (no need to count)
  5:
  Y:
  N:
  Accepted no need counting
  6: voting separately on each subpoint
  
  6.1: 
  Y:
  N:
  => means we remove suppleant from lists
  Accepted no need to count
  
  6.2
  Y:
  N:
  accepted
  
  6.3
  Y:
  N
  Remark: take care of side effects
  yet it doesn't mean the seat can go to another party
  Accepted
  
  6.4
  Y: 17+ 10
  N 7 +4
  Accepted
  
  6.5
  Y:
  N
  Accepted
  Comment: It means people can still go for an election while being elected in another assembly
  7:
  Y:
  N:
  Remark: reality is more complex, small companies also have public money. 
  Excludes cooperation.
  Rejected   
  8:
  Y:11+3 =14
  N:8+9 = 17
  Remark: very valuable, but should this be in our program?
  Rejected
  9:
  Y:
  N:
  accepted (unanimity)
   
  10:
  Y:
  N:
  Remark: is already a fact
  Not true: Belgacom for instance provides both
  Accepted
  11:
  Y:
  N:
  Remark: this is about how we want to introduce basic income and determine wether it's possible or not
  Accepted

Statutes

Suggestion: Let's try to discuss more and answer to objections instead of voting directly

  12A:
  Y:
  N:
  
  12B:
  Y:
  N:
  
  12C:
  Y:
  N:
  Whole block Rejected, because no consensus (no vote)
  13:
  Y:
  N:
  Remark: risk that a new specific rule will be made each time someone is to be kicked out?
  Rejected
  14:
  Y:16+6=22
  N:6+5=11
  Accepted