You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:
The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
This form allows you to manage the meeting pages on the wiki.
Note: If the changes do not appear immediately in the calendar, click on the "refresh" link in the drop-down menu to the left of the search bar. Your changes will appear anyway after a day.
== Details == We will meet in De 'l'Esperance', Rue du Finistère 1-3, 1000 Brussels at 14h00. The aim of this meeting will be to further define guidelines for a democratic meeting. Everybody who wants to help with this is, of course, welcome :) == Preparation == [https://pad.pirateparty.be/p/InternalDemocracy Direct link to the pad] <eplite id="InternalDemocracy" /> == Agenda == * Work further on the guidelines for meetings == Minutes == We splitted up in two groups. One group reviewed the input that was given on the pad, the other group talked about the structure of the guidelines-document. A short description of what we saw on the input:<br /> *The inputs were: **Exemple from Pat (Crew Gent?) : https://www.loomio.org/d/SAW3EFV2/comment/1303786 **Pascal > I added this File to the Democracy page as an exemple of Dynamic Participation : https://wiki.pirateparty.be/images/9/99/Fiches_Dynamique-Participative.pdf. This doc refers to an actual oragnisation policy inside a Scout Federation in Belgium (aka : this is how it works in my office) Things we thought were good: *Pascal's document: **Presentation was very good. (concept of bubbles was nice) **+1 for roundtable + the question of how people feel, their expectations and that at this point, there can't be any discussion **Consensus based is good :) **It's good that a similar roundtable is held at the end **Gent feedback **We see a similar roundtable, so this is good **Put some constraints on the roundtable ( *Things we thought about during these talks: **How to integrate newcomers in the group? **do we gave them some talk time? **do we ask them to sit and listen? **Opening and closing is individual-focussed. Structure of the meeting: inspired by the labs #Intro (plenary) ##Feeling/Mood (1-2 words) ##Expectations (=needs) roundtable(1-2 senteces) ##Wishes (preferences) roundtable (1-2 sentences) ##End Time roundtable ##Split up in subgroups unless exact same wishes and small number of poeple #Body (Subgroups) ##Possibility to introduce further (see Intro) ##Discussion ##Evaluation: this should be done when someone intends to leave. ###Feelings roundtable ###Pro's ans contra's of the process and discussion about ways to improve next time #Closing (Plenary) ##Each subgroup reports orally his conclusion/ decisions to the whole group ###feedback of the others: understanding ###feedback of the others: agree/ disagree, no discussion here ###if not finished or no unanimity: decide for a next submeeting involving poeple disagreeing ##Evaluation (30 minutes before the end time) ###feeling roudtable, 1-2 words ###Pro's and contra's of the plenary (intro and closing) and discussion about how to do next time ###What do we decide for next time: venue, date, hour, general goal, proposition of subgroups. Next time we would finish on the structure and begin with the report and moderation function.
Summary:
This is a minor edit Watch this page
Cancel
