You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:
The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
This form allows you to manage the meeting pages on the wiki.
Note: If the changes do not appear immediately in the calendar, click on the "refresh" link in the drop-down menu to the left of the search bar. Your changes will appear anyway after a day.
== Preparation == The meeting is to debrief the verdict of our appeal to State Council (cfr https://www.loomio.org/s/6peH8Exr ), and start the writing of an article about it. It will happen online using our audio-conferencing tool https://talk.parley.be/ The pad of this meeting : https://pad.parley.be/p/debrief-state-council == Report == Present : HgO, Pat, Ale, Vanecx *Some articles have been published in the press following our press release **in La Libre, DH, l'Avenir. Contact was made with RTBF but without an article being written. **relayed by the local opposition in Braine-l'Alleud, it will probably be brought on the table of next council meeting **the date of that next council meeting is not yet known https://www.braine-lalleud.be/fr/administration/mandataires/conseil-communal/calendrier-et-ordre-du-jour.html **Transparencia used the judgment of State Council during a presentation at the Walloon Parliament ***the video can be seen here : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaiC-3o97Ao&t=9548s in which we discover that Braine-l'Alleud is interested by the transparency platform deliberations.be ***While we're mentioning Transparencia, we received a request to share a petition between Pirates, to support the creation of a lobbies register : https://www.parlement-wallonie.be/pwpages?p=petition-detail&id=189 ***Transparencia has a meeting on 10/05, it might be a good idea to see where they currently stand *Until now, the judgment has not been published on Braine-l'Alleud's website *It would be good to have an article before this next council *Elements that should be included in the article: **cost - access to justice **energy spent, tiredness, stress **duration (?) **auditor had refused at first-reading (arguments?). Basically saying "yes on the substance, no on the form" **CADA has changed in the meanwhile. But since they received more decisional power, their position on draft minutes is more negative now. ***Will CADA become more positive again now with the judgment of State Council? **Next logical step after draft minutes is the annexes.
Summary:
This is a minor edit Watch this page
Cancel