General Assembly:2012/notes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Participations
- 26 members present
- 1 vote by procurement
- 4 people press
- Meeting was lead by Jurgen and Monika
- Notes taken by Pieter
Review of things done last year
- by Jurgen
- agenda overview
- overview of what pp did last year
A word about finances
- overview of financial state
- current amount on bank account: 1611.66
- in: 261.53
- out: 757.50
- change: 495.97
- banks:
- Black Pearl npo: bkcp banck,
- Pirate Party: bnp paribas
- we wanted to change BNP, but account number used by many members to pay membership.
- Black Pearl finances:
- swiss hosting: because of fairer hosting laws in Swiss (France not so good, hadopi, ...)
- 252.1 merchandising income
- new money needed for merchandising, printing costs
- Pirate Party finances
- 1859.84 total
- change +/- 1000 euros
- 35 contributing members ~ out of 2000 members following, 2% conversion rate
- 16 contributing monthly
- 19 contributing annually
- set target at 5% conversion rate? ~ 100 paying members, for next year?
- total 3471.5 - 750 loan = 2721.5 total, + value of merchandise
Q & A
- loan has been paid completely
- batch merchandising last time was +/- 900 euros
- graphs?
- xls, csv files available, who wants could make a graph like this.
- accessibility of data? multiple options to the future.
- memberships / donations
- memberships vi pp
- donations, max 25.000 via black pearl
- donations: disclosures? what are the rules? we should try to get a good and correct overview, especially now more Flemish involvement: could mean new rules.
- mandates on the bank accounts:
- originally: bkcp, BNP: both opened by Marouane and Jurgen.
- now: black pearl: only Jurgen
- now: pirate party: only Marouane
- bank statements of BNP arrive at Jurgen's home address, bank statements of Bkcp arrive at Marouanes address
- future should be: people of the board, needs to be fixed, on the list of the handover
- how many should get access? up to new structure
PBBe elections
- candidates, voting system
- discussion on 5 or 7 members
- can there be candidatures for more than one role
- we vote now on 7 or 5 board members
- board members have vote power
- some discussions
- complaints about clarity of of board functions
- current structure not clear
- board members: not clear what their function is; Jurgen answers:
- there was a demand from people to do it
- idea of dragging experience in from the past
- solution:
- complete candidacy list
- explain voting syst
- explain structure
- decide on 5 or 7
- another moment for posing candidacy
Lunch break
Because we are running out of time, Monika has been appointed time keeper.
Filming assembly
- A filming crew is present
- recording by journalism students
- some people, but not many, do not want to be filmed
Structure of the the PBBe
- explanation of current structure
- by Jurgen, using a mindmap (XMind)
- influences by Pirate Without Boards (ideas) organisation
- whole structure is currently run by three people
- Q: Thomas: Sociocracy; local idea or international idea
- A: Jurgen: based on known ideas inside the internation movement
- Q: Mimor: is the mindmap online?
- A: Jurgen: not yet, but will be, not official document.
Explanation of the voting system
Dynamic voting system:
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
- vote with multiple preferences, ordered by preference
- only the votes for elected people count
- proposal:
- vote for co-presidents
- people that do not make it, can choose te be candidate for the next vote
- this require separate vote for each position, to know for people to be candidate for next role
- counter args
- this means vote one by one, more time
- people can be candidate for multiple roles at the same time
- most popular can chose which role (if elected for more than one role) to take up first
- system
- we need verifiers
- two people for verification
- one person inputs in computer
- open source stv program
- actual voting happens in one go at the end
- motion: can everyone vote except press? voted yes;
- one voting by proxy? one, yes, next time we need to prepare this better.
- motion: 5 or 7; how many members in the board; voted for 5 persons in the board; (13 vs 10)
Candidates Present themselves
- 3 co-pres/co-chairman
- Jonas Degraeve
- Marouan El Moussaoui
- Koen De Voegt
- Paul Bossu
- 1 treasurer
- Nofel
- Thomas
- 1 general secretary
- Line
- Koen
- Q & A session for the candidates
Break
- motion: speed up presentation, try to limit to the essential to save time; voted yes;
Web/IT structure squad
Liquid Feedback
- presentation by Jonas
- translation to french? 5 hours of work; Monika wants to maybe do this
- logo choosen (red cards have it, right side of slide)
- we are going to transtion (upgrade) to version 2.0
Pirate squads
- intro Monika
- divide work of the party over different squads
- presentation of the people taking up different squads follows
social media squad
- Xavier
- e.g. facebook work
- statistics
- twitter?
- interactivity with the website
Web squad
- Presented by Mike and Line
- make main site an information portal; tell people who we are and what we do
- translation, seo, people want to help
- current design copied from other places
- lots of work
- who wants to help out
- thomas: helping out on the user-scenarios
- someone else in antwerp wants to help out
- within two weeks to come, line will communicate get together date
- Koen: youtube account is unblocked again
IT squad
- Presented by Jonas
- presentation redmine (project website)
- presentation forum; could be used more
- ...
- itworkgroup@pirateparty.be
- no ssh access
- will try to make email addresses for other squads
- translation work
- email addresses should be managed by the IT squad
- rename itworkgroup@pirateparty.be to itsquad@pirateparty.be
- question for more overview who what
Welcome squad
- Paul and Monika
- howto, info for new members
- welcome squad: welcoming people
- ewelcome: emails, etc..., direct to direct info
- physical welcome: crews, workmeetings, pirate beers
- ideas
- make guide
- peter/sponsor/marain for new members
- people needed
- three languages needed
- glenn will join the welcome squad
- currently: info@pirateparty.be websquad
Communal elections oct' 2012 followed by Q&A
- marouan
- different for every region
- every region has different rules
- presentation on Brussels/Wallonie
- deadlines of list, certain number of days before elections
- different strategies
- objective criteria to chose strategy
- marouane: think it is better to focus
- Thomas
- So you want to get elected? What you’ll need
- 100 exclusive signatures OR 1 signature exiting council member
- an ordered list of candidates on an official form including a list name**
- Sept 15 2011: deadline for lists
- The list(s)
- any EU civilian registered locally
- max: 55 (Antwerpen), 51 (Gent), 45 (Leuven)
- |M-V| ≤ 1
- different gender in 1st and 2nd place
- presence on multiple lists Ccity,district,province) is legal, but you can’t have a district+city mandate
- only one mandate per “family” (3rd degree)
- official doc to submit a list: not available yet
- Money
- keep your expenses! anything you spent for the elections, you need to report required by 13th of november
- gifts > 125 € are not anonymous, need to be mentioned in a report
- stickers are not presents
- Funky
- You can get a list of all registered voters in your region! (name, address, social security number), watch out for people asking
- operations: talking part yes or now, which way: decided by each crew individually
- Lionel: offers couch surfing in Namur area. To do stuff teambuilding. For everyone! +/- 12 places.
Break
Vote on the board members
Voting Results
- Co-president flanders: Jonas 20/26
- Co-president bxl: Marouan 22/26
- Co-president wallonie: Paul 25/26
- Secretary: Line 21/26
- Treasurer: Nofel 15/26
- Handover should be organised in the next week;
- Applause and thanks for the people that put so much work in the party the last three years: Jurgen and Monika!!!
Structure proposals
The F****g Manual
- By Marouan
Structure Proposal
- By Koen
Voting on statutes
- The F****g Manual becomes the new statutes: voted no
- Structure Proposal becomes the new statutes: voted no
- Do we organize making new statutes in the near future: voted yes