Press Jiu Jitsu: Difference between revisions

From Pirate Party Belgium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Here are some common situations and questions you may encounter when speaking with the press. Please note that this is a guide, not an instruction manual. As such, it is entirely...")
 
Line 6: Line 6:
* Looking for an *interesting* story. This can be, but isn't limited too: things that "resonate" on a personal level, things that challenge the status quo, etc. However much you are in agreement with something, that's usually just not interesting as news.
* Looking for an *interesting* story. This can be, but isn't limited too: things that "resonate" on a personal level, things that challenge the status quo, etc. However much you are in agreement with something, that's usually just not interesting as news.


Never take it personal. Never become unfriendly, even if the journalist is being a total ass. Since they hold the pen, you will *never* win.


Never take it personal. Never become unfriendly, even if the journalist is being a total ass. Since they hold the pen, you will *never* win.
A journalist isn't there to ''trick'' you, but it can definitely feel like it for the above reasons. That's why you should practice mental-verbal jiu jitsu: answer in such a way that you both avoid potential ''traps'' and still both get what you want. The journalist has to go home with an interesting interview with good quotes and you're going to help them with that.

Revision as of 12:31, 27 April 2012

Here are some common situations and questions you may encounter when speaking with the press. Please note that this is a guide, not an instruction manual. As such, it is entirely possible you don't agree with everything here. Please do not make it into an argument, instead please provide/list alternatives. We're here to collaborate, not te "be right".

Background

It's important to think from the perspective of the journalist *first*, what you are trying to say *second*. In most cases, this means the journalist's motivations include:

  • Looking for good quotes and clear opinions, so they don't have to sort out your mess. That's why they tend to ask very constrained questions or questions that feel like a "challenge".
  • Looking for an *interesting* story. This can be, but isn't limited too: things that "resonate" on a personal level, things that challenge the status quo, etc. However much you are in agreement with something, that's usually just not interesting as news.

Never take it personal. Never become unfriendly, even if the journalist is being a total ass. Since they hold the pen, you will *never* win.

A journalist isn't there to trick you, but it can definitely feel like it for the above reasons. That's why you should practice mental-verbal jiu jitsu: answer in such a way that you both avoid potential traps and still both get what you want. The journalist has to go home with an interesting interview with good quotes and you're going to help them with that.