UBIBregman: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIL_Y9g7Tg0 Tedx Maastricht movie] | [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIL_Y9g7Tg0 Tedx Maastricht movie] | ||
* citizen's dividend / free money for everyone | |||
* utopia have a tendency of coming through (democracy, equal rights women) | |||
* monthly grant enough to cover your basic needs | |||
* universal / right / unconditional | |||
* proven idea: experiments all over the world | |||
** big success | |||
** comparing test group | |||
** lower inequality / lower infant mortality / less health care / better emancipation rates / ... | |||
** cheapest and most civilized way to combat poverty | |||
** One experiment in London with a homeless man -> presence of high policing/healthcare costs | |||
:** 2009: each 2000 pounds cash -> What do you think is good for you? (no counselling required => no high expectations) -> 800 pounds -> 7/13 had a roof, 2 more housing, learned to cook, visited children, plans for the future, ... The experiment costed 50000 pound (=> factor 7 saved) | |||
:** -> rethink poverty | |||
* Changing economy: robots coming for our jobs | |||
** solution of 21st century to 20st | |||
** governments obsessed with pushing people into jobs -> inspectors of inspectors of inspectors... | |||
** Better alternative to our current welfare mess | |||
* 3 main vulnerable objections: | |||
** Calculations: too expensive : times of Thomas Paine true, but not true anymore. We are richer than ever. Because our forefathers works so hard. Eradicating poverty = investments. 1.75 billion to eradicate poverty in the US = 1/4 of military budget -> can pay for itself (?) | |||
** Free money => stop working (human nature). Each individually -> stop working? 99% -> no, I got dreams. -> what will other people do? -> they will probably stop working. Experiments tell us that most people want to contribute to society. Poor people work more. | |||
** It is a great idea, but the idea is too big. Politicians are too busy with themselves. Richard Nixon (conservative Watergate president) -> almost implemented basic income through house of representative, but senate rejected because it wanted a bigger basic income. | |||
In history, there is something called progress... | |||
Is not it time to update our world view? Ideas can change the world. Stronger than a thousand armies. |
Latest revision as of 21:22, 12 October 2015
- citizen's dividend / free money for everyone
- utopia have a tendency of coming through (democracy, equal rights women)
- monthly grant enough to cover your basic needs
- universal / right / unconditional
- proven idea: experiments all over the world
- big success
- comparing test group
- lower inequality / lower infant mortality / less health care / better emancipation rates / ...
- cheapest and most civilized way to combat poverty
- One experiment in London with a homeless man -> presence of high policing/healthcare costs
:** 2009: each 2000 pounds cash -> What do you think is good for you? (no counselling required => no high expectations) -> 800 pounds -> 7/13 had a roof, 2 more housing, learned to cook, visited children, plans for the future, ... The experiment costed 50000 pound (=> factor 7 saved) :** -> rethink poverty
- Changing economy: robots coming for our jobs
- solution of 21st century to 20st
- governments obsessed with pushing people into jobs -> inspectors of inspectors of inspectors...
- Better alternative to our current welfare mess
- 3 main vulnerable objections:
- Calculations: too expensive : times of Thomas Paine true, but not true anymore. We are richer than ever. Because our forefathers works so hard. Eradicating poverty = investments. 1.75 billion to eradicate poverty in the US = 1/4 of military budget -> can pay for itself (?)
- Free money => stop working (human nature). Each individually -> stop working? 99% -> no, I got dreams. -> what will other people do? -> they will probably stop working. Experiments tell us that most people want to contribute to society. Poor people work more.
- It is a great idea, but the idea is too big. Politicians are too busy with themselves. Richard Nixon (conservative Watergate president) -> almost implemented basic income through house of representative, but senate rejected because it wanted a bigger basic income.
In history, there is something called progress...
Is not it time to update our world view? Ideas can change the world. Stronger than a thousand armies.