User:Christophe/sandbox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Christophe (talk | contribs) |
Christophe (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
=====Further reads===== | =====Further reads===== | ||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inductive_reasoning Inductive Reasoning] | [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inductive_reasoning Inductive Reasoning] | ||
[http://bayes.wustl.edu/etj/prob/book.pdf Logic of science] | |||
[[User:Christophe|Christophe]] ([[User talk:Christophe|talk]]) 13:49, 18 January 2014 (CET) | [[User:Christophe|Christophe]] ([[User talk:Christophe|talk]]) 13:49, 18 January 2014 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 13:57, 18 January 2014
Christophe's Sample Page
A political opinion about informed democracy
- Our world poses certain issues that need to be acted upon.
- To understand the issue, one needs information.
- This information is fact-based.
- If you don't accept facts (or can't deny falsehoods), you cannot properly contribute.
- The democratic principle does never apply to facts, but only on how we humans want to respond to it.
- facts cannot be discussed, only proven or disproved by other facts (i.e. new information)
- All responses should also be validated as possible before it can be considered to be voted.
Further reads
Inductive Reasoning Logic of science
Christophe (talk) 13:49, 18 January 2014 (CET)