Difference between revisions of "Args Labs"
(→Email (one to one)) |
(→Discussion list (many to many)) |
||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
| | | | ||
* No transparency, impossible to re-use somebody else's argument if we haven't received the email. | * No transparency, impossible to re-use somebody else's argument if we haven't received the email. | ||
− | * Unclear communication, if everything is on the wiki it's easy to make sure we won't miss something. | + | * Unclear communication due to too many different channels, if everything is on the wiki it's easy to make sure we won't miss something. |
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 17:45, 20 October 2013
Debate: the content
- What should be included in this project?
--Vincent L. (talk) 23:00, 19 October 2013 (CEST): Pirate F.A.Q ; Debates about political topics ; Debates about pirates
Debate: The name
- Args labs? Pirate Party Politics?
--Vincent L. (talk) 22:55, 19 October 2013 (CEST): Args labs sounds good to me, and accurately describes the goal of this project.
Debate: the language
- Do we have to do everything in english?
--Vincent L. (talk) 22:55, 19 October 2013 (CEST): I don't think so, it's easier for me to debate in my mother tongue.
Debate: the support
- What would be the form of our debates?
--Vincent L. (talk) 22:55, 19 October 2013 (CEST): I think we should debate both on wiki and in live, an event in November in Namur on the theme "Qu'est-ce qu'une démocratie participative, quels sont les enjeux et les moyens pour y parvenir?" is likely to be organized.
Contents
Software
General
Wiki(many to many)
- url:
Pro | Con |
---|---|
|
Email (one to one)
- url:
Pro | Con |
---|---|
|
Discussion list (many to many)
- url:
Pro | Con |
---|---|
|
Forum (one to many)
- url:
Pro | Con |
---|---|
Blog
- url:
Pro | Con |
---|---|
Specialized
GetOpt
- url:
Pro | Con |
---|---|
Loomio
- url:
Pro | Con |
---|---|
At4am
- url:
Pro | Con |
---|---|
LiquidFeedback
- url:
Pro | Con |
---|---|