User:Tierce/sandbox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(exercices de traduction avec le guideline) |
(Marked this version for translation) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<translate> | <translate> | ||
== Introduction == | == Introduction == <!--T:1--> | ||
<!--T:2--> | |||
The following guidelines are a '''work-in-progress document''' produced by the [[Special:MyLanguage/Internal Democracy|Internal Democracy]] group. They are experimented at each of the group's meeting. | The following guidelines are a '''work-in-progress document''' produced by the [[Special:MyLanguage/Internal Democracy|Internal Democracy]] group. They are experimented at each of the group's meeting. | ||
== Structure of the meeting == | == Structure of the meeting == <!--T:3--> | ||
=== Intro ''plenary'' === | === Intro ''plenary'' === <!--T:4--> | ||
<!--T:5--> | |||
:There are tree short roundtables: | :There are tree short roundtables: | ||
:* Everyone tells at what '''time''' they want/need to leave. | :* Everyone tells at what '''time''' they want/need to leave. | ||
Line 17: | Line 19: | ||
:** Everyone tells their wishes. These are thing you would like to see done/like to do, but it's not so bad if these don't happen. | :** Everyone tells their wishes. These are thing you would like to see done/like to do, but it's not so bad if these don't happen. | ||
<!--T:6--> | |||
:After this subgroups are formed (3/5 people) based on wishes (what people want to do/talk about). | :After this subgroups are formed (3/5 people) based on wishes (what people want to do/talk about). | ||
=== Body ''in subgroups'' === | === Body ''in subgroups'' === <!--T:7--> | ||
<!--T:8--> | |||
Here people have the possibility to introduce further. | Here people have the possibility to introduce further. | ||
<!--T:9--> | |||
Discussion/work to be done. | Discussion/work to be done. | ||
<!--T:10--> | |||
Evaluation: this should be done every time someone intends to leave. This consists of: | Evaluation: this should be done every time someone intends to leave. This consists of: | ||
# Feeling roudtable (see [[#Intro plenary|Intro]]) | # Feeling roudtable (see [[#Intro plenary|Intro]]) | ||
# Everyone can say what they thought the pro and contra of the process were. Discussion on how the process can be improved can be done here. | # Everyone can say what they thought the pro and contra of the process were. Discussion on how the process can be improved can be done here. | ||
=== Closing ''plenary'' === | === Closing ''plenary'' === <!--T:11--> | ||
<!--T:12--> | |||
# Each subgroup reports orally his conclusion/decisions to the whole group | # Each subgroup reports orally his conclusion/decisions to the whole group | ||
## Everyone needs to make sure they understand the conclusions, but there is no further discussion here. | ## Everyone needs to make sure they understand the conclusions, but there is no further discussion here. |
Revision as of 23:29, 8 June 2017
Introduction
The following guidelines are a work-in-progress document produced by the Internal Democracy group. They are experimented at each of the group's meeting.
Structure of the meeting
Intro plenary
- There are tree short roundtables:
- Everyone tells at what time they want/need to leave.
- Everyone says how they feel/what there mood is (1-2 words)
- Everyone tells about their expectation(s) and/or wish(es)
- Expectations (what do they want to do/talk about/see happening). We defined expectations as things need to be done/happen or else you wouldn't want to come any more.
- Everyone tells their wishes. These are thing you would like to see done/like to do, but it's not so bad if these don't happen.
- After this subgroups are formed (3/5 people) based on wishes (what people want to do/talk about).
Body in subgroups
Here people have the possibility to introduce further.
Discussion/work to be done.
Evaluation: this should be done every time someone intends to leave. This consists of:
- Feeling roudtable (see Intro)
- Everyone can say what they thought the pro and contra of the process were. Discussion on how the process can be improved can be done here.
Closing plenary
- Each subgroup reports orally his conclusion/decisions to the whole group
- Everyone needs to make sure they understand the conclusions, but there is no further discussion here.
- When everyone is sure they understand, everyone can say if they agree/disagree. If everyone agrees, this is a decision. If this is not the case, this can be discussed further in a net meeting. There is no discussion here.
- If there is no unanimity: decide for a next submeeting involving people disagreeing.
- Evaluation (30 minutes before the end time)
- Feeling roudtable, 1-2 words
- Pro's and contra's of the plenaries (intro and closing) and discussion about how to do next time
- What do we decide for next time: venue, date, hour, general goal, proposition of subgroups.