Talk:Main Page test: Difference between revisions

From Pirate Party Belgium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎New main page: comment for welcome)
Line 48: Line 48:
* A central search bar: to make clear that the best is to type what you are looking for. I would put it before the map, clear and visible, with a short sentence like "Start your journey in the belgian pirates wiki here". I remember you found a nice one, so I guess it's doable?
* A central search bar: to make clear that the best is to type what you are looking for. I would put it before the map, clear and visible, with a short sentence like "Start your journey in the belgian pirates wiki here". I remember you found a nice one, so I guess it's doable?
::Ah yes, I forgot about this ! Yes, it is :) Is that good for you? --[[User:HgO|HgO]] ([[User talk:HgO|talk]]) 08:55, 27 February 2017 (CET)
::Ah yes, I forgot about this ! Yes, it is :) Is that good for you? --[[User:HgO|HgO]] ([[User talk:HgO|talk]]) 08:55, 27 February 2017 (CET)
::: Works great, thanks!
* Compared to the current main page, there is nothing here about pirates in general. That's ok for me, if we make clear that the welcome page is the way to go for that type of info... and if all that info is actually accessible from the welcome page (I don't think it's the case yet).
* Compared to the current main page, there is nothing here about pirates in general. That's ok for me, if we make clear that the welcome page is the way to go for that type of info... and if all that info is actually accessible from the welcome page (I don't think it's the case yet).
::Yes, I think we talked about this in December. I was actually wondering what we should do with the welcome page ? It is not finished yet. For me, if we redirect to the survival guide, it's good enough for now. We could work on the welcome page later on, maybe ? --[[User:HgO|HgO]] ([[User talk:HgO|talk]]) 08:55, 27 February 2017 (CET)
::Yes, I think we talked about this in December. I was actually wondering what we should do with the welcome page ? It is not finished yet. For me, if we redirect to the survival guide, it's good enough for now. We could work on the welcome page later on, maybe ? --[[User:HgO|HgO]] ([[User talk:HgO|talk]]) 08:55, 27 February 2017 (CET)

Revision as of 23:05, 28 February 2017

Notice: The content of this page has been archived here. --HgO (talk) 18:41, 4 December 2016 (CET)

Souce d'inspiration

Parmi les wiki qui ont leur petite notoriété dans leur domaine, il y a celui-ci pour les jeux vidéos. Le parallèle entre les crews et les équipes est assez évident, je propose d'explorer cette piste et de créer portail crews inspiré par ce layout.

--Vincent L. (talk) 15:55, 4 December 2016 (CET)


Perso, j'aime pas les truc Show / Hide et je préfère de loin (sur un wiki en out cas) click / jump to.
Tant qu'on y est ... est-ce que ça dérange quelqu'un si je vire tout ce qui est au-dessus et qui date de 2014 et avant? Après-tout, c'est quand même dans l'historique de vesion. Au moins on se dépolue les yeux et on s'épargne du scrolling ^_^
J'ai balancé tout ça dans une sous-page dédiée ;) Deux raisons: je comptais relire tout ça à mon aise un jour, et j'aime pas trop supprimer des trucs juste comme ça ^^' --HgO (talk) 18:51, 4 December 2016 (CET)
En revanche j'aime bien l'idée des onglets comme ici.
J'voudrais pas décourrager ... mais pour en arriver là ils en sont à 1000+ templates ... on en a 55 ^_^
Mais du coup ... c'est une mine à idées!
--Tierce (talk) 18:05, 4 December 2016 (CET)

Tu proposes d'afficher les équipages sous forme de colonnes/listes, c'est ça ? D'abord la région, puis la province et puis les équipages ? Ou bien juste province, et puis équipages ? Note que certains équipages n'ont pas de ville définie (je pense à la Crew West-Vlaanderen, par exemple) :/ --HgO (talk) 18:51, 4 December 2016 (CET)
C'est surtout l'utilsation des tabs qui me plaît. Entre-temps, mes goûts ont évolué et le layout du Wiktionnaire me plaît par sa clarté et sa simplicité. --Vincent L. (talk) 11:02, 23 December 2016 (CET)
J'aime bien le header, il m'est sympathique :) Ceci dit, je remarque que dans tous les projets de la wikimedia, aucun n'utilise de header global (càd qui reste visible sur chaque page). Je me demande donc s'il ne serait pas plus judicieux de transférer le menu dans la sidebar, tout en nettoyant un peu celle-ci (de toute façon, la sidebar n'a pas été prévue pour stocker beaucoup d'information. Par ex, il n'y a que deux niveaux d'indentation possibles (titre + élements de liste, ou catégories + sous-catégories). --HgO (talk) 11:36, 23 December 2016 (CET)

New main page

We started a project of having new main page that reflects the recent changes I did on the wiki (events, maps, translate extension, etc.).

Currently, I'm still not satisfied with the header banner. I would like to have those information displayed: survival guide, wiki manual, and maybe the Basic Text (although it is already mentioned in the surival guide, and newcomers probably fall on the wiki from the website).

I notice that currently the map seems to attract a lot of attention, which makes the links to help and welcome guide poorly visible, still, although they are in the banner. Possibly, what about adding some icons/images next to them inside the banner? --Valerie (talk) 21:18, 26 February 2017 (CET)
Indeed... maybe we could put them somewhere else ? Before or after the map, for instance ? I agree with the icons, that's a good idea anyway :) --HgO (talk) 08:55, 27 February 2017 (CET)
I agree that the 'welcome links' don't attract enough attention. I would think to just get them out of the banner and put them in a welcome section. The search new bar then can be part of that welcome section as well. -Ilja (talk) 12:34, 27 February 2017 (CET)

I would also like to find a better way to mention the list of crews and how to create a new crew. Right now, it's a bit too serious...

about "create a crew" it is a bit serious indeed and actually it is not about creating a crew but a wiki page for a crew, right? Maybe we should differentiate "I want to create a crew" and "finding the template for a new crew". I think actually the "new crew creation" should trigger a call to other pirates to get help for putting up a crew, so more about establishing communication. --Valerie (talk) 21:18, 26 February 2017 (CET)
Yes you are right about this difference ^^ There is a form for creating/editing the page of a crew, although I didn't finished it yet. Templates aren't needed, although one can still use them.
I'm not sure to understand how we could do this ? Which pirates should be informed of the creation of a new crew ? I don't think it's possible to send an email when creating the crew page. However, I think that there are extensions that allow us to watch a category, such as the Category:Crew, and to get notifications whenever a page is added to that category (ie. when a new crew page is created). --HgO (talk) 08:55, 27 February 2017 (CET)

Moreover, we wondered whether we display crews with an outdated wiki page (such as Crew Namur) or not. I agree that this is a bit disturbing for the visitors, but I think it gives at least some information on those crews. For instance, someone who'd be motivated enough could try to launch the crew again by contacting pirates. However, at the moment, crew pages don't offer an easy way to contact a crew (usually, there is a facebook link, but that's all).

I think leaving non-active crews on the main page gives a distorted image and it might well be disappointing for people who want to join a crew to learn that that crew doesn't really exist any more. I would not list them. If people want information on non-active crews, they should find that information on a list-of-crews-page where we can make a clear distinction between active and non-active crews -Ilja (talk) 12:54, 27 February 2017 (CET)
Actually, I'm not talking about inactive crews, but crews that have an outdated page ! That's different, because there is still activity within the crew, but people seems to be too lazy to update their page, or they don't meet anymore. In those crews, it should be fairly easy to "reactivate" them :)
Inactive crews (such as Crew Brussels) are not listed, for instance ;) --HgO (talk) 14:35, 27 February 2017 (CET)
Ah :D Forget I said anything then :p Yes, I believe listing them would be a good idea then :) -Ilja (talk) 15:43, 27 February 2017 (CET)

Finally, we discussed about the idea of task management system. I'm not sure whether it would be possible, but the idea would be to put a todo somewhere on the wiki, and this task would show up on a list on the main page. --HgO (talk) 15:13, 26 February 2017 (CET)

Is it really useful to have this on the main page? I would rather put this on each crew or project page. Or maybe I don't understand what type of "to do" you have in mind? --Valerie (talk) 21:18, 26 February 2017 (CET)
I'm not sure actually :p but I'd like to find a way to tell people where they can help, basically. I was thinking that maybe a global todo list would be helpfull. At the moment, pirates put their tasks on a project page or after the minutes, but there is no way to track them. You need to remember which pages contain tasks.
I had a look at possible extensions, but none of them is still maintained... So I guess it's not easy to implement :( --HgO (talk) 08:55, 27 February 2017 (CET)

Globally, I love this new version with the map, and the upcoming events. What else comes to my mind... : --Valerie (talk) 21:18, 26 February 2017 (CET)

  • A central search bar: to make clear that the best is to type what you are looking for. I would put it before the map, clear and visible, with a short sentence like "Start your journey in the belgian pirates wiki here". I remember you found a nice one, so I guess it's doable?
Ah yes, I forgot about this ! Yes, it is :) Is that good for you? --HgO (talk) 08:55, 27 February 2017 (CET)
Works great, thanks!
  • Compared to the current main page, there is nothing here about pirates in general. That's ok for me, if we make clear that the welcome page is the way to go for that type of info... and if all that info is actually accessible from the welcome page (I don't think it's the case yet).
Yes, I think we talked about this in December. I was actually wondering what we should do with the welcome page ? It is not finished yet. For me, if we redirect to the survival guide, it's good enough for now. We could work on the welcome page later on, maybe ? --HgO (talk) 08:55, 27 February 2017 (CET)
Maybe we can integrate the welcome page in the welcome-section I proposed earlier? :) That would make the welcome-page obsolete, and gets all relevant information one click closer to new visitors :) -Ilja (talk) 12:36, 27 February 2017 (CET)
I've made the welcome section :) All relevant information from the welcome page and banner should be in there :) Let me know what you think ;) -Ilja (talk) 13:34, 27 February 2017 (CET)
Thank you ! I've made big changes to your section, because I thought there was too much information. I'd like to keep simply sentences ^^ Also, you were mentionning crews, but I would put that kind of information in the Participate section. Maybe we can add a link to that section, since it's quite hidden by the Welcome section... --HgO (talk) 14:35, 27 February 2017 (CET)
Yes, I love this new text! (And I like the \o/ ) But now it seems like there is to much white-space... And the banner is gone ö Why is the rum banner gone? ö -Ilja (talk) 16:07, 27 February 2017 (CET)
I've put the banner back and put the 'Welcome to the wiki of the Belgian Pirates! \o/' in the banner. I think a banner keeps attention away from other 'clutter' (like the standard top and sidebars that every page has), and generally makes the page look better. If someone doesn't agree, you can always remove it again :p I won't fight over it ;) -Ilja (talk) 16:26, 27 February 2017 (CET)
I did remove the banner because I was thinking it was redundant with the logo on the top of the sidebar. But I like how it is now :)
For me, it's a good thing if there is white-spaces on a landing page, because it prevents the visitor to be overloaded by too much information ^^
I think we are good with the welcome section now, but feel free to make your changes ;) I would like to focus on the participate section now. --HgO (talk) 19:25, 27 February 2017 (CET)
I confirm white spaces are important and it looks good now! About the welcome page: to be discussed face to face to avoid overflowing here but I am not a fan of the present situation: welcoming people on the wiki and welcoming people inside the party are two different functions, each requiring a dedicated page, to my opinion. Less welcome here, just a redirection to a proper page.

I've mentioned the work we were doing in the FB-group to see what people think about it so far. The reactions where positive :) Someone wondered if it would also be possible for the project list to also add a link to the relevant loomio-group (if this exists). I was thinking, if we decide that this would be a good idea, to add a variable to the project sidebar to link to a loomio group so we can extract that information and place it in the list. -Ilja (talk) 12:44, 27 February 2017 (CET)

Nice ! I'm glad people like it :)
Yes, it's possible, but I'm thinking about refactoring the project sidebar template. You can see a start of a draft here. --HgO (talk) 14:35, 27 February 2017 (CET)