Talk:Democracy/Meeting/12 11 2012: Difference between revisions
Paul Nollen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (Franky moved page Talk:Democracy/November 12th 2012 to Talk:Democracy/Meeting/12 11 2012: meeting naming convention) |
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 10:22, 10 February 2017
"Another topic of discussion was the rules governing the behaviour of elected representatives. It was said that they should sign some contract with the party, ensuring they will vote only according to the choices of the citizens. The legality of this point is not certain. "
On the contrary: The illegality of this proposal is certain. It is against the law to impose any pressure, direct or indirect, on the way a representative has to vote.
The party discipline works by denying a revolting representative an electable place on the election list in the next elections. It is even impossible to force a representative to resign his office. The party can, and is allowed, to ask the representative to do so. --Paul Nollen 09:47, 14 November 2012 (CET)
This is all I have for the moment:
Advies 33.789/AV en 33.791/AV van de Raad van State ... Het door de Grondwet aldus ingesteld representatieve stelsel impliceert dat het de volksvertegenwoordigende vergaderingen zijn die de beslissingen nemen in de aangelegenheden die tot hun bevoegdheid behoren en dat ze in de uitoefening van hun mandaat, noch in rechte, noch in feite, mogen worden gebonden. ...
Conseil d'État 33.789/AV et 33.791/AV ... (a completer avec les liens etc..)
--Paul Nollen 12:40, 14 November 2012 (CET)