User:Christophe/sandbox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Christophe (talk | contribs) |
Christophe (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
# Our world poses certain issues that need to be acted upon. | # Our world poses certain issues that need to be acted upon. | ||
# To understand the issue, one needs information. | # To understand the issue, one needs information. | ||
## This information is fact-based. | ## This information is fact-based[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact]. | ||
# If you don't accept facts (or can't deny falsehoods), you cannot properly contribute. | # If you don't accept facts (or can't deny falsehoods), you cannot properly contribute. | ||
# The democratic principle does never apply to facts, but only on how we humans want to respond to it. | # The democratic principle does never apply to facts, but only on how we humans want to respond to it. | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[http://bayes.wustl.edu/etj/prob/book.pdf Logic of science] | [http://bayes.wustl.edu/etj/prob/book.pdf Logic of science] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:01, 18 January 2014
Christophe's Sample Page
A political opinion about informed democracy
- Our world poses certain issues that need to be acted upon.
- To understand the issue, one needs information.
- This information is fact-based[1].
- If you don't accept facts (or can't deny falsehoods), you cannot properly contribute.
- The democratic principle does never apply to facts, but only on how we humans want to respond to it.
- facts cannot be discussed, only proven or disproved by other facts (i.e. new information)
- All responses should also be validated as possible before it can be considered to be voted.