Events/EGA:2013-09/Notes: Difference between revisions

From Pirate Party Belgium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Meeting notes unformatted v0.1)
 
m (move pad from piratepad to pad.pirateparty.be)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Click on this link to access to the pads used to produce the following page: '''[https://pad.pirateparty.be/p/EGA2013liege '''https://pad.pirateparty.be/p/EGA2013liege''']
== Voting ==
== Voting ==
Note takers:
* sandb
* Vincent L.
* fred m.


Introduced a third option for voting: next to  
Introduced a third option for voting: next to  
* "yes" (green) or  
* "yes" (green) or  
* "no" (red)  
* "no" (red)  
we introduce  
we introduce  
* "postponed" (white): voted unanimously yes
* "postponed" (white)
 
White option voted '''yes''' unanimously  


questions:
* Minimum of 2 votes difference, else postponed automatically
* Minimum of 2 votes difference, else postponed automatically
* Not 50% for green, then it is not yes?
* Not 50% for green, then it is not yes?
Note takers:
* sandb
* Vincent L.
* fred m.
Everybody counts votes if close call.
General remark: rejected does not mean it definatly rejected,


Discussion on voting; do we go for classic voting and forgo the adaption?
Discussion on voting; do we go for classic voting and forgo the adaption?
* 21 yes
* 21 yes
* 3 no
* 3 no
* accepted
* Accepted, classic voting
 
* So we will not be using the white paper option
1. rejected
 
2.1 (french version): accepted
* translation problem: radicale democratie should be directe democratie
2.2  accepted
2.3. accepted
2.4. accepted
 
3. rejected/postponed
 
4. rejected
 
5. rejected
* 19 no
* 14 yes
 
6.  accepted
 
7. 23 vs 13 accepted
 
8. accepted (better written version of 9)
 
9. rejected  15 vs 24
 
10. accepted
 
11. Remark: this definition can be applied to every company accepted 21 vs 17 after recount
how could we make anyone liable to use public facilities?
 
12. accepted
 
13. accepted remark: Assange is not a wistleblower, better if names were removed (voted as is, but could use an amendment)
 
14. accepted remark: better definition required for "net neutrality".
 
15. accepted; remarks: it's more or less already in there: but remarks about only postal system and human rights with similar initiative.
 
16. rejected; remarks: factual issue in the proposal since the press can be censored, what about private data protection
 
17. accepted 24 vs 11; remarks: fuzzy language
 
18. rejected ;remarks: what is "democratie radicale" ? is it "imposed democracy" ;) We need another word than "radical" (2.1)
 
19. rejected 14 vs 24
 
20. rejected ;remarks: fuzzy "what's being for the referendum ?" how do we define referendum ?
 
21. postponed 18 vs 16
 
22. rejected ;remarks: what does that mean ? we already have justice system
 
23. accepted ;remarks: this is about someone who's been elected, not for candidates;
 
24. accepted 20 vs ? ;remarks: the proposal is too vague, too general
 
25. rejected; remarks what do we mean by recognize ? (aknowledge existence or legitimity ?)
 
26. rejected - same remark as 25.
 
27. accepted
 
28. accepted
 
29. accepted 25 vs ?; remarks: vague and fuzzy ? ambiguous ? what does local economy mean? does it mean protectionism? note: does not explain, also does not say protectionism
 
30. rejected/postponed ;remarks : what does "resource" means; answer from author: means "resource based economy"  needs clarification
 
31. accepted 20 vs 13; remarks: what's "alternative economy" ? see examples
 
32. rejected 14 vs 18
 
33. rejected ;remarks: not clear on what it really means
 
34. rejected ;remark: it's a statement, not a program point or opinion
 
35. accepted; anonymous
 
36. rejected ;remarks : need to change EU laws for that; the first part is already in 27;
 
37. accepted
 
38. accepted
 
39. accepted ; remarks :  universal basic income (everyone); what's the definition of basic income ? ; also remarked: "factual error, labour is not an economic product"
 
40. accepted ; remarks : minimun wage (working people only)
 
41. accepted
 
42. rejected; remarks: this  is demagogy, ideology, unclear, fuzzy
 
43.rejected, except by Kash; remarks :  implies corporate citizenship? (==a company is having same right as a citizen)
 
44. rejected
 
45. rejected (awfully stated)
 
46. postponed ;17 vs 15 ;remarks : european law problem; very hard to realize
 
47. accepted
 
48. rejected 10/18 remark:  who's "them" ? Pirates or citizens ?
 
49. accepted


50. accepted
Counting:
* Everybody counts votes if it's a close call.


51.  accepted (rem: should state "a public audit" or something like that)
General remark:  
* Rejected does not mean it definitely Rejected,


52.  rejected ;remarks: 1. cannot be done in only one country, 2. should explicitely read a wage/profit "ratio". 3. is missing clear definition and is quite populist position; how would we explain this to a journalist
Proposals: [[File:PP_EGA_september_2013.pdf]].


53.  rejected
== Motion 1: The Pirateparty Programme ==


54. rejected 14 vs 17; remarks : lower cap but also upper cap limitation, should maybe say minimally
=== [1.1] Proposal for an "Introduction for the party programme" ===


55. rejected ;remarks: Too vague, should say public financing (with money from the state), also who would finance a bank that has gone bust anyway? ; too anecdoctical, lack of big picture.
{{GaProp|1|Rejected}}
{{GaProp|2.1|Accepted|remarks=
** French version is leading version
** translation problem: radicale democratie should be directe democratie}}
{{GaProp|2.2|Accepted}}
{{GaProp|2.3|Accepted}}
{{GaProp|2.4|Accepted}}
{{GaProp|3|Rejected/Postponed}}
{{GaProp|4|Rejected}}
{{GaProp|5|Rejected|-=19|+=14}}


56. accepted; remarks: the national part could be left out
=== [1.2] Freedoms and civilian rights ===


57. rejected remarks: why only bankers
{{GaProp|6|Accepted}}
{{GaProp|7|Accepted|+=23|-=13 }}
{{GaProp|8|Accepted|remarks=
** better written version of 9}}
{{GaProp|9|Rejected|+=15|-=24}}
{{GaProp|10|Accepted}}
{{GaProp|11|Accepted|+=21|-=17|remarks=
** this definition can be applied to every company
** required recount
** how could we make anyone liable to use public facilities?}}
{{GaProp|12|Accepted}}
{{GaProp|13|Accepted|remarks=
** Assange is not a wistleblower
** better if names were removed
** Voted as is, but could use an amendment}}
{{GaProp|14|Accepted|remarks=
** Better definition required for "net neutrality".}}
{{GaProp|15|Accepted|remarks=
** It's more or less already in there: but remarks about only postal system and human rights with similar initiative.}}
{{GaProp|16|Rejected|remarks=
** Factual issue in the proposal since the press can be censored, what about private data protection}}
{{GaProp|17|Accepted|+=24|-=11|remarks=
** Fuzzy language}}


Proposal to deal with running-out-of-time: ACCEPTED
=== [1.3] Domestic politics and democracy ===
    - whatever is not voted here today will be submitted on getopinionated
    - and will be voted on getopinionated
    - and will be valid as if elected on the EGA
    - with voting closing before the first november
    - only members will be able to vote: each Pirate will receive his/her membership via email, and then registrations will be closed (for security).
    - only proposals from the program will be voted


** has been voted yes
{{GaProp|18|Rejected|remarks=
** what is "democratie radicale"?
** is it "imposed democracy" ;)
** We need another word than "radical" (2.1)}}
{{GaProp|19|Rejected|+=14|-=24}}
{{GaProp|20|Rejected|remarks=
** fuzzy "what's being for the referendum?"
** how do we define referendum?}}
{{GaProp|21|Postponed|+=18|-=16}}
{{GaProp|22|Rejected|remarks=
** what does that mean?
** we already have justice system}}
{{GaProp|23|Accepted|remarks=
** This is about someone who's been elected, not for candidates;}}
{{GaProp|24|Accepted|+=20|remarks=
** The proposal is too vague, too general}}
{{GaProp|25|Rejected|remarks=
** What do we mean by recognize? (aknowledge existence or legitimity ?)}}
{{GaProp|26|Rejected|remarks=
** Same remark as 25.}}


58. rejected; unclear: what are policticians, while they are active or allways; only banks? ... ?
=== [1.4] Economics ===


59. accepted unanymously
{{GaProp|27|Accepted}}
{{GaProp|28|Accepted}}
{{GaProp|29|Accepted|+=25|remarks=
** Vague and fuzzy?
** Ambiguous?
** What does local economy mean?
** Does it mean protectionism?
** note: does not explain, also does not say protectionism}}
{{GaProp|30|Rejected/Postponed|remarks=
** What does "resource" means; answer from author: means "resource based economy"  needs clarification}}
{{GaProp|31|Accepted|+=20|-=13|remarks=
** what's "alternative economy"?
** see examples}}
{{GaProp|32|Rejected|+=14|-=18}}
{{GaProp|33|Rejected|remarks=
** not clear on what it really means}}
{{GaProp|34|Rejected|remarks=
** it's a statement, not a program point or opinion}}
{{GaProp|35|Accepted}}
{{GaProp|36|Rejected|remarks=
** need to change EU laws for that
** the first part is already in 27}}
{{GaProp|37|Accepted}}
{{GaProp|38|Accepted}}
{{GaProp|39|Accepted|remarks=
** universal basic income (everyone)
** what's the definition of basic income?
** also remarked: "factual error, labour is not an economic product"}}
{{GaProp|40|Accepted|remarks=
** minimun wage (working people only)}}
{{GaProp|41|Accepted}}
{{GaProp|42|Rejected|remarks=
** this  is demagogy, ideology, unclear, fuzzy}}
{{GaProp|43|Rejected|remarks=
** implies corporate citizenship? (==a company is having same right as a citizen)}}
{{GaProp|44|Rejected}}
{{GaProp|45|Rejected|remarks=
**awfully stated}}
{{GaProp|46|Postponed|+=17|-=15|remarks=
** European law problem;
** Very hard to realize}}
{{GaProp|47|Accepted}}
{{GaProp|48|Rejected|+=10|-=18|remarks=
** Who is "them"?
** Pirates or citizens?}}
{{GaProp|49|Accepted}}
{{GaProp|50|Accepted}}
{{GaProp|51|Accepted|remarks=
** Should state "a public audit" or something like that}}
{{GaProp|52|Rejected|remarks=
** cannot be done in only one country,
** should explicitely read a wage/profit "ratio".  
** is missing clear definition and is quite populist position;
** how would we explain this to a journalist}}
{{GaProp|53|Rejected}}
{{GaProp|54|Rejected|+=14|-=17|remarks=
** lower cap but also upper cap limitation, should maybe say minimally}}


60. rejected
=== [1.5] Banks ===


61. rejected ; remarks: this would mean we have to exit the euro
{{GaProp|55|Rejected|remarks=
** Too vague,
** should say public financing (with money from the state),
** also who would finance a bank that has gone bust anyway?
** too anecdoctical, lack of big picture.}}
{{GaProp|56|Accepted|remarks=
** the national part could be left out}}
{{GaProp|57|Rejected|remarks
** why only bankers}}


62. accepted (rem: what is a dubious investment ? who defines it ?)
We interupted voting because we are quickly running out-of-time;
* a proposal was made to deal with this problem
** whatever is not voted here today will be submitted on getopinionated
** and will be voted on getopinionated
** and will be valid as if elected on the EGA
** with voting closing before the first november
** only members will be able to vote: each Pirate will receive his/her membership via email, and then registrations will be closed (for security).
** only proposals from the program will be voted
* the proposal was accepted,
* a decision was made to continue up until proposal 62 and to end before point "1.6 Labour social affairs".


{{GaProp|58|Rejected|remarks=
** unclear: what are policticians, while they are active or allways; only banks? ... ? }}
{{GaProp|59|Accepted unanymously}}
{{GaProp|60|Rejected}}
{{GaProp|61|Rejected|remarks=
** This would mean we have to exit the euro}}
{{GaProp|62|Accepted|remarks=
** What is a dubious investment? Who defines it?)}}


EOEGA- End of General Assembly
== EOEGA- End of General Assembly ==


BIG THX TO ORGANISERS!!
* BIG THX TO ORGANISERS!!
* End at 17:50

Latest revision as of 19:09, 6 March 2017

Click on this link to access to the pads used to produce the following page: https://pad.pirateparty.be/p/EGA2013liege

Voting

Note takers:

  • sandb
  • Vincent L.
  • fred m.

Introduced a third option for voting: next to

  • "yes" (green) or
  • "no" (red)

we introduce

  • "postponed" (white)

White option voted yes unanimously

questions:

  • Minimum of 2 votes difference, else postponed automatically
  • Not 50% for green, then it is not yes?

Discussion on voting; do we go for classic voting and forgo the adaption?

  • 21 yes
  • 3 no
  • Accepted, classic voting
  • So we will not be using the white paper option

Counting:

  • Everybody counts votes if it's a close call.

General remark:

  • Rejected does not mean it definitely Rejected,

Proposals: PP EGA september 2013.pdf.

Motion 1: The Pirateparty Programme

[1.1] Proposal for an "Introduction for the party programme"

1:

  • Status: Rejected

2.1:

  • Status: Accepted
  • Notes:
    • French version is leading version
    • translation problem: radicale democratie should be directe democratie

2.2:

  • Status: Accepted

2.3:

  • Status: Accepted

2.4:

  • Status: Accepted

3:

  • Status: Rejected/Postponed

4:

  • Status: Rejected

5:

  • Status: Rejected
  • Votes for: 14
  • Votes against: 19

[1.2] Freedoms and civilian rights

6:

  • Status: Accepted

7:

  • Status: Accepted
  • Votes for: 23
  • Votes against: 13

8:

  • Status: Accepted
  • Notes:
    • better written version of 9

9:

  • Status: Rejected
  • Votes for: 15
  • Votes against: 24

10:

  • Status: Accepted

11:

  • Status: Accepted
  • Votes for: 21
  • Votes against: 17
  • Notes:
    • this definition can be applied to every company
    • required recount
    • how could we make anyone liable to use public facilities?

12:

  • Status: Accepted

13:

  • Status: Accepted
  • Notes:
    • Assange is not a wistleblower
    • better if names were removed
    • Voted as is, but could use an amendment

14:

  • Status: Accepted
  • Notes:
    • Better definition required for "net neutrality".

15:

  • Status: Accepted
  • Notes:
    • It's more or less already in there: but remarks about only postal system and human rights with similar initiative.

16:

  • Status: Rejected
  • Notes:
    • Factual issue in the proposal since the press can be censored, what about private data protection

17:

  • Status: Accepted
  • Votes for: 24
  • Votes against: 11
  • Notes:
    • Fuzzy language

[1.3] Domestic politics and democracy

18:

  • Status: Rejected
  • Notes:
    • what is "democratie radicale"?
    • is it "imposed democracy" ;)
    • We need another word than "radical" (2.1)

19:

  • Status: Rejected
  • Votes for: 14
  • Votes against: 24

20:

  • Status: Rejected
  • Notes:
    • fuzzy "what's being for the referendum?"
    • how do we define referendum?

21:

  • Status: Postponed
  • Votes for: 18
  • Votes against: 16

22:

  • Status: Rejected
  • Notes:
    • what does that mean?
    • we already have justice system

23:

  • Status: Accepted
  • Notes:
    • This is about someone who's been elected, not for candidates;

24:

  • Status: Accepted
  • Votes for: 20
  • Notes:
    • The proposal is too vague, too general

25:

  • Status: Rejected
  • Notes:
    • What do we mean by recognize? (aknowledge existence or legitimity ?)

26:

  • Status: Rejected
  • Notes:
    • Same remark as 25.

[1.4] Economics

27:

  • Status: Accepted

28:

  • Status: Accepted

29:

  • Status: Accepted
  • Votes for: 25
  • Notes:
    • Vague and fuzzy?
    • Ambiguous?
    • What does local economy mean?
    • Does it mean protectionism?
    • note: does not explain, also does not say protectionism

30:

  • Status: Rejected/Postponed
  • Notes:
    • What does "resource" means; answer from author: means "resource based economy" needs clarification

31:

  • Status: Accepted
  • Votes for: 20
  • Votes against: 13
  • Notes:
    • what's "alternative economy"?
    • see examples

32:

  • Status: Rejected
  • Votes for: 14
  • Votes against: 18

33:

  • Status: Rejected
  • Notes:
    • not clear on what it really means

34:

  • Status: Rejected
  • Notes:
    • it's a statement, not a program point or opinion

35:

  • Status: Accepted

36:

  • Status: Rejected
  • Notes:
    • need to change EU laws for that
    • the first part is already in 27

37:

  • Status: Accepted

38:

  • Status: Accepted

39:

  • Status: Accepted
  • Notes:
    • universal basic income (everyone)
    • what's the definition of basic income?
    • also remarked: "factual error, labour is not an economic product"

40:

  • Status: Accepted
  • Notes:
    • minimun wage (working people only)

41:

  • Status: Accepted

42:

  • Status: Rejected
  • Notes:
    • this is demagogy, ideology, unclear, fuzzy

43:

  • Status: Rejected
  • Notes:
    • implies corporate citizenship? (==a company is having same right as a citizen)

44:

  • Status: Rejected

45:

  • Status: Rejected
  • Notes:
    • awfully stated

46:

  • Status: Postponed
  • Votes for: 17
  • Votes against: 15
  • Notes:
    • European law problem;
    • Very hard to realize

47:

  • Status: Accepted

48:

  • Status: Rejected
  • Votes for: 10
  • Votes against: 18
  • Notes:
    • Who is "them"?
    • Pirates or citizens?

49:

  • Status: Accepted

50:

  • Status: Accepted

51:

  • Status: Accepted
  • Notes:
    • Should state "a public audit" or something like that

52:

  • Status: Rejected
  • Notes:
    • cannot be done in only one country,
    • should explicitely read a wage/profit "ratio".
    • is missing clear definition and is quite populist position;
    • how would we explain this to a journalist

53:

  • Status: Rejected

54:

  • Status: Rejected
  • Votes for: 14
  • Votes against: 17
  • Notes:
    • lower cap but also upper cap limitation, should maybe say minimally

[1.5] Banks

55:

  • Status: Rejected
  • Notes:
    • Too vague,
    • should say public financing (with money from the state),
    • also who would finance a bank that has gone bust anyway?
    • too anecdoctical, lack of big picture.

56:

  • Status: Accepted
  • Notes:
    • the national part could be left out

57:

  • Status: Rejected

We interupted voting because we are quickly running out-of-time;

  • a proposal was made to deal with this problem
    • whatever is not voted here today will be submitted on getopinionated
    • and will be voted on getopinionated
    • and will be valid as if elected on the EGA
    • with voting closing before the first november
    • only members will be able to vote: each Pirate will receive his/her membership via email, and then registrations will be closed (for security).
    • only proposals from the program will be voted
  • the proposal was accepted,
  • a decision was made to continue up until proposal 62 and to end before point "1.6 Labour social affairs".

58:

  • Status: Rejected
  • Notes:
    • unclear: what are policticians, while they are active or allways; only banks? ... ?

59:

  • Status: Accepted unanymously

60:

  • Status: Rejected

61:

  • Status: Rejected
  • Notes:
    • This would mean we have to exit the euro

62:

  • Status: Accepted
  • Notes:
    • What is a dubious investment? Who defines it?)

EOEGA- End of General Assembly

  • BIG THX TO ORGANISERS!!
  • End at 17:50