Events/EGA:2013-09/Notes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* Accepted | * Accepted | ||
== Motion 1: The Pirateparty Programme == | |||
=== 1.1 Proposal for an "Introduction for the party programme" === | |||
{{GaProp|1|Rejected}} | {{GaProp|1|Rejected}} | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
{{GaProp|5|Rejected|-=19|+=14}} | {{GaProp|5|Rejected|-=19|+=14}} | ||
=== 1.2 Freedoms and civilian rights === | |||
{{GaProp|6|Accepted}} | {{GaProp|6|Accepted}} | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
** We need another word than "radical" (2.1)}} | ** We need another word than "radical" (2.1)}} | ||
=== 1.3 Domestic politics and democracy === | |||
{{GaProp|19|Rejected|+=14|-=24}} | {{GaProp|19|Rejected|+=14|-=24}} | ||
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
** Same remark as 25.}} | ** Same remark as 25.}} | ||
=== 1.4 Economics === | |||
{{GaProp|27|Accepted}} | {{GaProp|27|Accepted}} | ||
Line 147: | Line 147: | ||
** lower cap but also upper cap limitation, should maybe say minimally}} | ** lower cap but also upper cap limitation, should maybe say minimally}} | ||
=== 1.5 Banks === | |||
{{GaProp|55|Rejected|remarks= | {{GaProp|55|Rejected|remarks= |
Revision as of 19:32, 29 September 2013
Voting
Introduced a third option for voting: next to
- "yes" (green) or
- "no" (red)
we introduce
- "postponed" (white): voted unanimously yes
- Minimum of 2 votes difference, else postponed automatically
- Not 50% for green, then it is not yes?
Note takers:
- sandb
- Vincent L.
- fred m.
Everybody counts votes if close call. General remark: Rejected does not mean it definatly Rejected,
Discussion on voting; do we go for classic voting and forgo the adaption?
- 21 yes
- 3 no
- Accepted
Motion 1: The Pirateparty Programme
1.1 Proposal for an "Introduction for the party programme"
1:
- Status: Rejected
2.1:
- Status: Accepted
- Notes:
- French version is leading version
- translation problem: radicale democratie should be directe democratie
2.2:
- Status: Accepted
2.3:
- Status: Accepted
2.4:
- Status: Accepted
3:
- Status: Rejected/Postponed
4:
- Status: Rejected
5:
- Status: Rejected
- Votes for: 14
- Votes against: 19
1.2 Freedoms and civilian rights
6:
- Status: Accepted
7:
- Status: Accepted
- Votes for: 23
- Votes against: 13
8:
- Status: Accepted
- Notes:
- better written version of 9
9:
- Status: Rejected
- Votes for: 15
- Votes against: 24
10:
- Status: Accepted
11:
- Status: {{{2}}}
- Votes for: 21
- Votes against: 17
- Notes:
- this definition can be applied to every company
- required recount
- how could we make anyone liable to use public facilities?
12:
- Status: Accepted
13:
- Status: Accepted
- Notes:
- Assange is not a wistleblower
- better if names were removed
- Voted as is, but could use an amendment
14:
- Status: Accepted
- Notes:
- Better definition required for "net neutrality".
15:
- Status: Accepted
- Notes:
- It's more or less already in there: but remarks about only postal system and human rights with similar initiative.
16:
- Status: Rejected
- Notes:
- Factual issue in the proposal since the press can be censored, what about private data protection
17:
- Status: Accepted
- Votes for: 24
- Votes against: 11
- Notes:
- Fuzzy language
18:
- Status: Rejected
- Notes:
- what is "democratie radicale"?
- is it "imposed democracy" ;)
- We need another word than "radical" (2.1)
1.3 Domestic politics and democracy
19:
- Status: Rejected
- Votes for: 14
- Votes against: 24
20:
- Status: Rejected
- Notes:
- fuzzy "what's being for the referendum?"
- how do we define referendum?
21:
- Status: Postponed
- Votes for: 18
- Votes against: 16
22:
- Status: Rejected
- Notes:
- what does that mean?
- we already have justice system
23:
- Status: Accepted
- Notes:
- This is about someone who's been elected, not for candidates;
24:
- Status: Accepted
- Votes for: 20
- Notes:
- The proposal is too vague, too general
25:
- Status: Rejected
- Notes:
- What do we mean by recognize? (aknowledge existence or legitimity ?)
26:
- Status: Rejected
- Notes:
- Same remark as 25.
1.4 Economics
27:
- Status: Accepted
28:
- Status: Accepted
29:
- Status: Accepted
- Votes for: 25
- Notes:
- Vague and fuzzy?
- Ambiguous?
- What does local economy mean?
- Does it mean protectionism?
- note: does not explain, also does not say protectionism
30:
- Status: Rejected/Postponed
- Notes:
- What does "resource" means; answer from author: means "resource based economy" needs clarification
31:
- Status: Accepted
- Votes for: 20
- Votes against: 13
- Notes:
- what's "alternative economy"?
- see examples
32:
- Status: Rejected
- Votes for: 14
- Votes against: 18
33:
- Status: Rejected
- Notes:
- not clear on what it really means
34:
- Status: Rejected
- Notes:
- it's a statement, not a program point or opinion
35:
- Status: Accepted
36:
- Status: Rejected
- Notes:
- need to change EU laws for that
- the first part is already in 27
37:
- Status: Accepted
38:
- Status: Accepted
39:
- Status: Accepted
- Notes:
- universal basic income (everyone)
- what's the definition of basic income?
- also remarked: "factual error, labour is not an economic product"
40:
- Status: Accepted
- Notes:
- minimun wage (working people only)
41:
- Status: Accepted
42:
- Status: Rejected
- Notes:
- this is demagogy, ideology, unclear, fuzzy
43:
- Status: Rejected
- Notes:
- implies corporate citizenship? (==a company is having same right as a citizen)
44:
- Status: Rejected
45:
- Status: Rejected
- Notes:
- awfully stated
46:
- Status: Postponed
- Votes for: 17
- Votes against: 15
- Notes:
- European law problem;
- Very hard to realize
47:
- Status: Accepted
48:
- Status: Rejected
- Votes for: 10
- Votes against: 18
- Notes:
- Who is "them"?
- Pirates or citizens?
49:
- Status: Accepted
50:
- Status: Accepted
51:
- Status: Accepted
- Notes:
- Should state "a public audit" or something like that
52:
- Status: Rejected
- Notes:
- cannot be done in only one country,
- should explicitely read a wage/profit "ratio".
- is missing clear definition and is quite populist position;
- how would we explain this to a journalist
53:
- Status: Rejected
54:
- Status: Rejected
- Votes for: 14
- Votes against: 17
- Notes:
- lower cap but also upper cap limitation, should maybe say minimally
1.5 Banks
55:
- Status: Rejected
- Notes:
- Too vague,
- should say public financing (with money from the state),
- also who would finance a bank that has gone bust anyway?
- too anecdoctical, lack of big picture.
56:
- Status: Accepted
- Notes:
- the national part could be left out
57:
- Status: Rejected
We interuppted voting because we are quickly running out-of-time;
- a proposal was made to deal with this problem
- whatever is not voted here today will be submitted on getopinionated
- and will be voted on getopinionated
- and will be valid as if elected on the EGA
- with voting closing before the first november
- only members will be able to vote: each Pirate will receive his/her membership via email, and then registrations will be closed (for security).
- only proposals from the program will be voted
- the proposal was accepted,
- a decision was made to continue up until proposal 62 and to end before point "1.6 Labour social affairs".
58:
- Status: Rejected
- Notes:
- unclear: what are policticians, while they are active or allways; only banks? ... ?
59:
- Status: Accepted unanymously
60:
- Status: Rejected
61:
- Status: Rejected
- Notes:
- This would mean we have to exit the euro
62:
- Status: Accepted
- Notes:
- What is a dubious investment? Who defines it?)
EOEGA- End of General Assembly
- BIG THX TO ORGANISERS!!
- End at 17:50