Difference between revisions of "User:Christophe/sandbox"

From Pirate Party Belgium
Jump to: navigation, search
(A political opinion about informed democracy)
(Christophe's Sample Page)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
# Our world poses certain issues that need to be acted upon.
 
# Our world poses certain issues that need to be acted upon.
 
# To understand the issue, one needs information.  
 
# To understand the issue, one needs information.  
## This information is fact-based.
+
## This information is fact-based[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact].
 
# If you don't accept facts (or can't deny falsehoods), you cannot properly contribute.
 
# If you don't accept facts (or can't deny falsehoods), you cannot properly contribute.
 
# The democratic principle does never apply to facts, but only on how we humans want to respond to it.
 
# The democratic principle does never apply to facts, but only on how we humans want to respond to it.
Line 13: Line 13:
 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inductive_reasoning Inductive Reasoning]
 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inductive_reasoning Inductive Reasoning]
  
[[User:Christophe|Christophe]] ([[User talk:Christophe|talk]]) 13:49, 18 January 2014 (CET)
+
[http://bayes.wustl.edu/etj/prob/book.pdf Logic of science]

Latest revision as of 14:01, 18 January 2014

Christophe's Sample Page

A political opinion about informed democracy

  1. Our world poses certain issues that need to be acted upon.
  2. To understand the issue, one needs information.
    1. This information is fact-based[1].
  3. If you don't accept facts (or can't deny falsehoods), you cannot properly contribute.
  4. The democratic principle does never apply to facts, but only on how we humans want to respond to it.
    1. facts cannot be discussed, only proven or disproved by other facts (i.e. new information)
    2. All responses should also be validated as possible before it can be considered to be voted.
Further reads

Inductive Reasoning

Logic of science