Difference between revisions of "Internal Democracy/Meeting/26 03 2017"
(Created page with "{{MeetingSidebar |meetingname=Internal Democracy: Creating guidelines |city=Brussels |postalcode=1000 |address=Rue du Finistère 1-3 |venue=l'Esperance |linkvenue=http://www.h...") |
(→Minutes) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
== Minutes == | == Minutes == | ||
| + | We splitted up in two groups. One group reviewed the input that was given on the pad, the other group talked about the structure of the guidelines-document. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A short description of what we saw on the input:<br /> | ||
| + | *The inputs were: | ||
| + | **Exemple from Pat (Crew Gent?) : https://www.loomio.org/d/SAW3EFV2/comment/1303786 | ||
| + | **Pascal > I added this File to the Democracy page as an exemple of Dynamic Participation : https://wiki.pirateparty.be/images/9/99/Fiches_Dynamique-Participative.pdf. This doc refers to an actual oragnisation policy inside a Scout Federation in Belgium (aka : this is how it works in my office) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Things we thought were good: | ||
| + | *Pascal's document: | ||
| + | **Presentation was very good. (concept of bubbles was nice) | ||
| + | **+1 for roundtable + the question of how people feel, their expectations and that at this point, there can't be any discussion | ||
| + | **Consensus based is good :) | ||
| + | **It's good that a similar roundtable is held at the end | ||
| + | **Gent feedback | ||
| + | **We see a similar roundtable, so this is good | ||
| + | **Put some constraints on the roundtable ( | ||
| + | *Things we thought about during these talks: | ||
| + | **How to integrate newcomers in the group? | ||
| + | **do we gave them some talk time? | ||
| + | **do we ask them to sit and listen? | ||
| + | **Opening and closing is individual-focussed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The result of the other group should be updated in the near future. | ||
Revision as of 18:23, 26 March 2017
| |||
| Workgroup | Democracy | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | Sun 26 March 2017 | ||
| Time | 2:00pm | ||
| Venue | l'Esperance | ||
| Address |
| ||
| City | |||
| |||
Loading map...
| |||
| Find routes on OpenStreetMap | |||
| Export | iCalendar | ||
| Clone this meeting | |||
Contents
Details
We will meet in De 'l'Esperance', Rue du Finistère 1-3, 1000 Brussels at 14h00.
The aim of this meeting will be to further define guidelines for a democratic meeting. Everybody who wants to help with this is, of course, welcome :)
Preparation
Agenda
- Work further on the guidelines for meetings
Minutes
We splitted up in two groups. One group reviewed the input that was given on the pad, the other group talked about the structure of the guidelines-document.
A short description of what we saw on the input:
- The inputs were:
- Exemple from Pat (Crew Gent?) : https://www.loomio.org/d/SAW3EFV2/comment/1303786
- Pascal > I added this File to the Democracy page as an exemple of Dynamic Participation : https://wiki.pirateparty.be/images/9/99/Fiches_Dynamique-Participative.pdf. This doc refers to an actual oragnisation policy inside a Scout Federation in Belgium (aka : this is how it works in my office)
Things we thought were good:
- Pascal's document:
- Presentation was very good. (concept of bubbles was nice)
- +1 for roundtable + the question of how people feel, their expectations and that at this point, there can't be any discussion
- Consensus based is good :)
- It's good that a similar roundtable is held at the end
- Gent feedback
- We see a similar roundtable, so this is good
- Put some constraints on the roundtable (
- Things we thought about during these talks:
- How to integrate newcomers in the group?
- do we gave them some talk time?
- do we ask them to sit and listen?
- Opening and closing is individual-focussed.
The result of the other group should be updated in the near future.
