Difference between revisions of "Events/EGA:2014-01/voting-day1"
m (Vincent.L moved page Events/EGA:2014-01/voting/day1 to Events/EGA:2014-01/voting-day1 without leaving a redirect) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | =='''Program'''== | |
| − | + | 1: postponed | |
| − | |||
| − | 1: | ||
Y: 14 + 3 =17 | Y: 14 + 3 =17 | ||
N: 9 +9= 18 | N: 9 +9= 18 | ||
| − | |||
Remark: | Remark: | ||
-Think about implication towards who owns this debt (to debate in arglab?) | -Think about implication towards who owns this debt (to debate in arglab?) | ||
-This is the same as bankrupt ? | -This is the same as bankrupt ? | ||
| − | 2: | + | 2: accepted |
Y: 16 + 8= 24 | Y: 16 + 8= 24 | ||
N:10 + 4= 14 | N:10 + 4= 14 | ||
| − | |||
| − | 3: | + | 3: Accepted |
Y:11+ 10=21 | Y:11+ 10=21 | ||
N:12+3 = 15 | N:12+3 = 15 | ||
Remark: "The most important" could be excessive | Remark: "The most important" could be excessive | ||
| − | |||
| − | 4: | + | 4: Rejected (no need to count) |
Y: | Y: | ||
N: | N: | ||
Remark: there is more to do about animal rights than banning hunt | Remark: there is more to do about animal rights than banning hunt | ||
Question: is it also about fishing? | Question: is it also about fishing? | ||
| − | No, just hunting | + | No, just hunting |
| − | |||
| − | 5: | + | 5: Accepted no need counting |
Y: | Y: | ||
N: | N: | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | 6: voting separately on each subpoint | ||
| − | + | 6.1: Accepted no need to count | |
| − | 6.1: | ||
Y: | Y: | ||
N: | N: | ||
=> means we remove suppleant from lists | => means we remove suppleant from lists | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | 6.2 | + | 6.2: accepted |
Y: | Y: | ||
N: | N: | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | 6.3 | + | 6.3: Accepted |
Y: | Y: | ||
N | N | ||
Remark: take care of side effects | Remark: take care of side effects | ||
yet it doesn't mean the seat can go to another party | yet it doesn't mean the seat can go to another party | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | 6.4: Accepted | |
| − | 6.4 | ||
Y: 17+ 10 | Y: 17+ 10 | ||
N 7 +4 | N 7 +4 | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | 6.5 | + | 6.5: Accepted |
Y: | Y: | ||
N | N | ||
| − | |||
Comment: It means people can still go for an election while being elected in another assembly | Comment: It means people can still go for an election while being elected in another assembly | ||
| − | 7: | + | 7: Rejected |
Y: | Y: | ||
N: | N: | ||
Remark: reality is more complex, small companies also have public money. | Remark: reality is more complex, small companies also have public money. | ||
Excludes cooperation. | Excludes cooperation. | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | 8: Rejected | |
| − | 8: | ||
Y:11+3 =14 | Y:11+3 =14 | ||
N:8+9 = 17 | N:8+9 = 17 | ||
Remark: very valuable, but should this be in our program? | Remark: very valuable, but should this be in our program? | ||
| − | |||
| − | 9: | + | 9: accepted (unanimity) |
Y: | Y: | ||
N: | N: | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | 10: Accepted | |
| − | 10: | ||
Y: | Y: | ||
N: | N: | ||
Remark: is already a fact | Remark: is already a fact | ||
Not true: Belgacom for instance provides both | Not true: Belgacom for instance provides both | ||
| − | |||
| − | 11: | + | 11: Accepted |
Y: | Y: | ||
N: | N: | ||
Remark: this is about how we want to introduce basic income and determine wether it's possible or not | Remark: this is about how we want to introduce basic income and determine wether it's possible or not | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | =='''Statutes'''== | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | Suggestion: Let's try to discuss more and answer to objections instead of voting directly | |
| + | |||
| + | 12: Whole block Rejected, because no consensus (no vote) | ||
| + | |||
12A: | 12A: | ||
Y: | Y: | ||
N: | N: | ||
| + | |||
12B: | 12B: | ||
Y: | Y: | ||
N: | N: | ||
| + | |||
12C: | 12C: | ||
Y: | Y: | ||
N: | N: | ||
| − | |||
| − | 13: | + | 13: Rejected |
Y: | Y: | ||
N: | N: | ||
Remark: risk that a new specific rule will be made each time someone is to be kicked out? | Remark: risk that a new specific rule will be made each time someone is to be kicked out? | ||
| − | |||
| − | 14: | + | 14: Accepted |
Y:16+6=22 | Y:16+6=22 | ||
N:6+5=11 | N:6+5=11 | ||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 13:31, 25 January 2014
Program
1: postponed Y: 14 + 3 =17 N: 9 +9= 18 Remark: -Think about implication towards who owns this debt (to debate in arglab?) -This is the same as bankrupt ?
2: accepted Y: 16 + 8= 24 N:10 + 4= 14
3: Accepted Y:11+ 10=21 N:12+3 = 15 Remark: "The most important" could be excessive
4: Rejected (no need to count) Y: N: Remark: there is more to do about animal rights than banning hunt Question: is it also about fishing? No, just hunting
5: Accepted no need counting Y: N:
6: voting separately on each subpoint 6.1: Accepted no need to count Y: N: => means we remove suppleant from lists 6.2: accepted Y: N: 6.3: Accepted Y: N Remark: take care of side effects yet it doesn't mean the seat can go to another party 6.4: Accepted Y: 17+ 10 N 7 +4 6.5: Accepted Y: N Comment: It means people can still go for an election while being elected in another assembly
7: Rejected Y: N: Remark: reality is more complex, small companies also have public money. Excludes cooperation.
8: Rejected Y:11+3 =14 N:8+9 = 17 Remark: very valuable, but should this be in our program?
9: accepted (unanimity) Y: N:
10: Accepted Y: N: Remark: is already a fact Not true: Belgacom for instance provides both
11: Accepted Y: N: Remark: this is about how we want to introduce basic income and determine wether it's possible or not
Statutes
Suggestion: Let's try to discuss more and answer to objections instead of voting directly
12: Whole block Rejected, because no consensus (no vote) 12A: Y: N: 12B: Y: N: 12C: Y: N:
13: Rejected Y: N: Remark: risk that a new specific rule will be made each time someone is to be kicked out?
14: Accepted Y:16+6=22 N:6+5=11
