<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.pirateparty.be/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=UBIDeGrauwe</id>
	<title>UBIDeGrauwe - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.pirateparty.be/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=UBIDeGrauwe"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.pirateparty.be/index.php?title=UBIDeGrauwe&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-06-01T19:52:54Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.pirateparty.be/index.php?title=UBIDeGrauwe&amp;diff=16134&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Josse: Created page with &quot; == Arguments ==  [http://www.demorgen.be/opinie/een-universeel-basisinkomen-kan-nooit-van-de-grond-komen-a2166604/ A universal basic income can never take off]  He argues bas...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.pirateparty.be/index.php?title=UBIDeGrauwe&amp;diff=16134&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2015-10-14T22:56:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot; == Arguments ==  [http://www.demorgen.be/opinie/een-universeel-basisinkomen-kan-nooit-van-de-grond-komen-a2166604/ A universal basic income can never take off]  He argues bas...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Arguments ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.demorgen.be/opinie/een-universeel-basisinkomen-kan-nooit-van-de-grond-komen-a2166604/ A universal basic income can never take off]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He argues based on calculations in [http://www.economieblog.be/wordpress/kostprijs-universeel-basisinkomen-belgie/] that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We still need to fill in a gap of 35 billion euros (we give everyone a basic income and deduce the unnecessary costs of the government)&lt;br /&gt;
* This would mean that the tax pressure would go from 50% to 60% of the bbp which is unsustainable&lt;br /&gt;
* A working majority receives a basic income that is independent of the labour effort, but will have to pay extra taxes (and not a little bit) for their labour.  And that is the best way to demotivate to go to work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Counterarguments == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is extra income to be found in extra jobs in the private sector + if 15% of the children is raised in poverty, don&amp;#039;t they provide a tremendous potential + ...&lt;br /&gt;
* Who says the 50% of the government capacity can not be decreased?&lt;br /&gt;
* We are already doomed at more than 50% -&amp;gt; we are sleepwalking towards 60 right now, with 54 already&lt;br /&gt;
* The most important motivation for work is not the income.  The income should be righteous.  Motivation is more like: being able to work independent, being able to feel your place in the organisation (e.g. by communicating with peers, ...) , have the right competences, ....&lt;br /&gt;
* If you compare wages in Belgium right now, then you can see that for a diverse range of professions, the wages are not that far from each other either. &lt;br /&gt;
* Even if we tax more on labour with a basic income, the  end result might still be less taxes.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Josse</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>