Args Labs - Revision history

HgO: category project

2016-10-06T21:16:34Z

category project

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:16, 6 October 2016
Line 123:		Line 123:
	\|		\|
	\|}		\|}

			[[category:Project]

Rutabaga: /* Wiki(many to many) */

2013-10-21T16:32:36Z

Wiki(many to many)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:32, 21 October 2013
Line 39:		Line 39:
	* Creative Commons		* Creative Commons
	* Pirate-hosted		* Pirate-hosted
			* Notifications
	\|		\|
	\|}		\|}

Vincent.L at 19:22, 20 October 2013

2013-10-20T19:22:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:22, 20 October 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~'''~~Debate: the content~~'''~~		=== Debates ===

			==== Debate: the content ====

	* What should be included in this project?		* What should be included in this project?
Line 5:		Line 7:
	--[[User:Vincent.L\|Vincent L.]] ([[User talk:Vincent.L\|talk]]) 23:00, 19 October 2013 (CEST): Pirate F.A.Q ; Debates about political topics ; Debates about pirates		--[[User:Vincent.L\|Vincent L.]] ([[User talk:Vincent.L\|talk]]) 23:00, 19 October 2013 (CEST): Pirate F.A.Q ; Debates about political topics ; Debates about pirates

	~~'''~~Debate: The name~~'''~~		==== Debate: The name ====

	* Args labs? Pirate Party Politics?		* Args labs? Pirate Party Politics?

	--[[User:Vincent.L\|Vincent L.]] ([[User talk:Vincent.L\|talk]]) 22:55, 19 October 2013 (CEST): Args labs sounds good to me, and accurately describes the goal of this project.		--[[User:Vincent.L\|Vincent L.]] ([[User talk:Vincent.L\|talk]]) 22:55, 19 October 2013 (CEST): Args labs sounds good to me, and accurately describes the goal of this project.
			==== Debate: the language ====
	~~'''~~Debate: the language~~'''~~

	* Do we have to do everything in english?		* Do we have to do everything in english?
Line 17:		Line 18:
	--[[User:Vincent.L\|Vincent L.]] ([[User talk:Vincent.L\|talk]]) 22:55, 19 October 2013 (CEST): I don't think so, it's easier for me to debate in my mother tongue.		--[[User:Vincent.L\|Vincent L.]] ([[User talk:Vincent.L\|talk]]) 22:55, 19 October 2013 (CEST): I don't think so, it's easier for me to debate in my mother tongue.

	~~'''~~Debate: the support~~'''~~		==== Debate: the support ====

	* What would be the form of our debates?		* What would be the form of our debates?

Vincent.L: /* Discussion list (many to many) */

2013-10-20T15:46:28Z

Discussion list (many to many)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:46, 20 October 2013
Line 62:		Line 62:
	\|		\|
	* No transparency, impossible to re-use somebody else's argument if we haven't received the email.		* No transparency, impossible to re-use somebody else's argument if we haven't received the email.
	* Unclear communication due to too many ~~different~~ channels, if everything is on the wiki it's easy to make sure we won't miss something.		* Unclear communication due to too many communication channels, if everything is on the wiki it's easy to make sure we won't miss something.
	\|}		\|}

Vincent.L: /* Discussion list (many to many) */

2013-10-20T15:45:59Z

Discussion list (many to many)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 20 October 2013
Line 62:		Line 62:
	\|		\|
	* No transparency, impossible to re-use somebody else's argument if we haven't received the email.		* No transparency, impossible to re-use somebody else's argument if we haven't received the email.
	* Unclear communication, if everything is on the wiki it's easy to make sure we won't miss something.		* Unclear communication due to too many different channels, if everything is on the wiki it's easy to make sure we won't miss something.
	\|}		\|}

Vincent.L: /* Email (one to one) */

2013-10-20T15:45:33Z

Email (one to one)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 20 October 2013
Line 50:		Line 50:
	\|		\|
	* No transparency, impossible to re-use somebody else's argument if we haven't received the email.		* No transparency, impossible to re-use somebody else's argument if we haven't received the email.
	* Unclear communication, if everything is on the wiki it's easy to make sure we won't miss something.		* Unclear communication due to too many communication channels, if everything is on the wiki it's easy to make sure we won't miss something.
	\|}		\|}

Vincent.L: /* Wiki(many to many) */

2013-10-20T15:45:00Z

Wiki(many to many)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 20 October 2013
Line 33:		Line 33:
	\|-		\|-
	\|		\|
			* Centralized
			* Transparent
			* copiable
			* Creative Commons
			* Pirate-hosted
	\|		\|
	\|}		\|}

Vincent.L: /* General */

2013-10-20T15:44:00Z

General

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:44, 20 October 2013
Line 25:		Line 25:
	=== Software ===		=== Software ===
	==== General ====		==== General ====

			===== Wiki(many to many) =====
			* url:
			{\| border="1" cellspacing="0"
			! Pro
			! Con
			\|-
			\|
			\|
			\|}

	===== Email (one to one) =====		===== Email (one to one) =====
	* url:		* url:
Line 67:		Line 78:
	\|		\|
	\|}		\|}

	==== Specialized ====		==== Specialized ====
	===== GetOpt =====		===== GetOpt =====

Vincent.L: /* Discussion list (many to many) */

2013-10-20T15:43:01Z

Discussion list (many to many)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:43, 20 October 2013
Line 45:		Line 45:
	\|		\|
	\|		\|
			* No transparency, impossible to re-use somebody else's argument if we haven't received the email.
			* Unclear communication, if everything is on the wiki it's easy to make sure we won't miss something.
	\|}		\|}

	===== Forum (one to many) =====		===== Forum (one to many) =====
	* url:		* url:

Vincent.L: /* Email (one to one) */

2013-10-20T15:42:23Z

Email (one to one)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:42, 20 October 2013
Line 33:		Line 33:
	\|		\|
	\|		\|
			* No transparency, impossible to re-use somebody else's argument if we haven't received the email.
			* Unclear communication, if everything is on the wiki it's easy to make sure we won't miss something.
	\|}		\|}

	===== Discussion list (many to many) =====		===== Discussion list (many to many) =====
	* url:		* url: